Post Random Maps Here 2.0. (user search)
       |           

Welcome, Guest. Please login or register.
Did you miss your activation email?
May 21, 2024, 11:41:04 PM
News: Election Simulator 2.0 Released. Senate/Gubernatorial maps, proportional electoral votes, and more - Read more

  Talk Elections
  Presidential Elections - Analysis and Discussion
  Election What-ifs? (Moderator: Dereich)
  Post Random Maps Here 2.0. (search mode)
Pages: [1]
Author Topic: Post Random Maps Here 2.0.  (Read 210446 times)
Hydera
Jr. Member
***
Posts: 1,545


« on: November 26, 2017, 07:02:33 PM »
« edited: November 26, 2017, 07:13:37 PM by ( ͡° ͜ʖ ͡°) »

1980 without the Fed induced recession and inflation went moderately down. Liberals side with carter compared to 1976 because of Reagan while Carter regains momentum. And narrowly wins the electoral college.





1984 with Mondale running for vice-president and benefiting from the 1983-1984 economic rebound. The issue of Mondale being considered too liberal causes him to lose Mississippi and Alabama.




1984 with Ted Kennedy winning the primary and being unacceptable in many parts of the South.



1984 pre-scandal Gary Hart wins the primary and runs on an energetic campaign that swings the Western United States.



1984 With Lloyd Bentsen and Frank Church.and assuming as in all the other 1984 scenarios. Carter is the incumbent President and the democrats get the credit for the 1983-1984 rebound.  While it is an electoral landslide those interior Western states being more religious and having higher concentration of mormons, gun owners, and rural religious voters means it stays republican.

Logged
Hydera
Jr. Member
***
Posts: 1,545


« Reply #1 on: January 14, 2018, 10:55:23 PM »





Top: Bill Clinton's 1992 Missouri win map

Bottom: 2006 Missouri senate primary map with Bill Clinton Young as blue against McCaskill. Most likely result is people walking into the primary booth and seeing Bill Clinton Young and laughing and voting him as a joke. And he ended up doing outperforming despite being a joke candidate in Areas that Bill won in Missouri.
Logged
Hydera
Jr. Member
***
Posts: 1,545


« Reply #2 on: January 29, 2018, 06:37:45 PM »
« Edited: January 31, 2018, 04:09:25 AM by Hydera »

Pretty sure i done this already but imagine Finnish elections and putting Finnish parties in the American political scene.


Imagine if True Finns didnt become it is. And Center Party is basically the Democratic Party and sides with the broad left coalition.



2020 Parliamentary election.






Center-Left Coalition:


Social Democratic Party - Elizabeth Warren 24%

Center - Joe Biden 16%

Left Party - 14%

Green party - Jill Stein 2%


Center-Right Coalition:

True Finns - Donald Trump 17%


Christian Democratic Party - Ted Cruz 12%

Blue Reform - Marco Rubio 8%


National Coalition Party - John McCain 4%


Swedish People's Party - Rand Paul 3%






Center-left Coalition - 54% of Parliament seats

Center-Right Coalition - 44% of Parliament Seats

Other(Did Not meet threshold) - 2%

The political upheaval of the past four years results in a movement for proportional representation. (somehow) is also enacted a nationwide postal ballot system which eases voting for poorer households.


Result: Elizabeth Warren is the first Prime Minister of the United States.



2021 Presidential Election.


Primary.

Center Party - Jason Kander 31% (Also Backed by the National Coalition Party)

True Finns - Donald Trump 22%

Left Party - Bernie Sanders: 20%(Backed by Social Democratic Party)

Christian Democratic Party - Ted Cruz 14%

Blue Reform - Jeb Bush 8%

Green Party - Ralph Nader 4%


Swedish People's Party - Justin Amash 1%





Run-off:

Center Party - Jason Kander 62%

True Finns - Donald Trump 38%




While Donald Trump tried to take positions to the left and right, the low approval ratings while in office makes voters weary of voting for Trump. Furthermore during the first and only Presidential debate he stressed that he would be open to dissolving any government especially one headed by "Pocahontas" that he felt was weak on borders. The firestorm along with Jason Kanders:s pledge to support any government regardless of ideology as long as they received a working majority or a possible minority government. convinces many moderate centre-right voters to support him.  Furthermore the positive approval with the action of the Warren cabinet in enacting Universal health coverage and faxes on the very wealthy prevented an election surprise like that of 2016.




Logged
Hydera
Jr. Member
***
Posts: 1,545


« Reply #3 on: January 30, 2018, 10:56:17 PM »

Guess the scenario in which this would happen....




Democrats run Joe Manchin and a Missouri or Kentucky politician for VP. 

A dirty primary fight between Donald Trump and Marco Rubio means that Marco Rubio becomes the Republican nominee while Trump creates his own right wing populist party that takes in a lot of rural right-wing votes.

Joe Manchin decides to go right-wing on immigration to win his home state. While Rubio selects Chris Christie for VP and somehow people forget about bridgegate.

Result is Manchin wins the strongest democratic states in the West and midwest and northeast. However his right-wing immigration policy makes hispanics turn to Rubio. Allowing Rubio to win Colorado and Nevada.


Also Rubio winning Maryland, New Jersey, Connecticut and New Hampshire is only possible with a plurality but otherwise he manages to win those states by appealing to suburbanites.
Logged
Pages: [1]  
Jump to:  


Login with username, password and session length

Terms of Service - DMCA Agent and Policy - Privacy Policy and Cookies

Powered by SMF 1.1.21 | SMF © 2015, Simple Machines

Page created in 0.107 seconds with 11 queries.