Russia-Ukraine war and related tensions Megathread
       |           

Welcome, Guest. Please login or register.
Did you miss your activation email?
May 11, 2024, 02:26:58 PM
News: Election Simulator 2.0 Released. Senate/Gubernatorial maps, proportional electoral votes, and more - Read more

  Talk Elections
  General Politics
  International General Discussion (Moderators: afleitch, Hash)
  Russia-Ukraine war and related tensions Megathread
« previous next »
Thread note
ATTENTION: Please note that copyright rules still apply to posts in this thread. You cannot post entire articles verbatim. Please select only a couple paragraphs or snippets that highlights the point of what you are posting.


Pages: 1 ... 1162 1163 1164 1165 1166 [1167]
Author Topic: Russia-Ukraine war and related tensions Megathread  (Read 904376 times)
Hindsight was 2020
Hindsight is 2020
Atlas Icon
*****
Posts: 13,504
United States


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #29150 on: May 10, 2024, 02:29:38 PM »

Really amazing they’d waste armor like this for essentially a border raid over supporting the Donbas push


It's stretching the Ukrainian forces thinner like I said previously.

Tatarigami_UA - who runs the Frontelligence Substack site:

Quote
Overnight, Russian infrantry, backed by armored vehicles, entered Kharkiv oblast from Belgorod area, using small tactical units. Frontelligence Insight had previously cautioned about this scenario. Here's what we know about it:

The capture of border villages like Strilecha, Krasne, Pylne, and Borysivka isn't unexpected. It's an anticipated maeuver to divert Ukrainian resources from the main Russian offensive in Donbas. Considering manpower shortages, Ukraine will be forced to redeploy some personnel.

...

Russians anticipate a significant social backlash, inducing panic and demands for resolution. This pressure aims to compel the redeployment  of units from critical areas of Russian advances in Donbas. Meanwhile, Russian forces deploy infantry units incapable of deep strikes.

The situation is expected to evolve, with Russian forces deploying more units to penetrate additional border areas or to reinforce initial successes. With our estimate of their force equivalent to two Russian corps, they can sustain this operation.

Thus far, the Russian forces have not breached the main Ukrainian defense. Given the time required for Ukrainian units to deploy to the area, it is premature to assess the overall success or failure of this incursion. We will continue to provide updates.

Rob Lee agrees, says it's designed to take units away from defending Chasiv Yar and Pokrovsk.

If I'm Russian leadership considering Ukrainian manpower shortages, just play a game of 15-on-13 rugby along the frontline, find where they don't have men or their presence is light and attack the gainline on that day.
Yeah I know this is there thinking but it could just as easily bite them in the ass as it’s wasting equipment on fortified areas when they are facing stock depletion issues by next year


One of his posts I did not copy is these areas are not fortified because the border is a gray zone. The fortifications are further inland.
If they want to actually draw Ukrainian forces away they have to push towards the fortified areas that hold strategic importance the areas they raised today aren’t going to get that desired effect
Logged
Woody
SirWoodbury
Junior Chimp
*****
Posts: 6,139


Political Matrix
E: 1.48, S: 1.30

Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #29151 on: May 10, 2024, 05:28:08 PM »

DeepstateUA: "The enemy's offensive continues near Gatyshche, Lukyantsi and Hlyboke."

The gray zone expands

https://deepstatemap.live/en#10/50.2267/36.8262
Logged
Hnv1
YaBB God
*****
Posts: 3,517


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #29152 on: Today at 04:05:13 AM »

I feel like the AFU high command decided they are willing to sacrifice some swath of land in Kharkov to maintain the front in Donetsk. Which is reasonable considering the Russians can't take Kharkov city, and the Donetsk urban sprawl is the best blockage to stop a Russian offensive
Logged
Hindsight was 2020
Hindsight is 2020
Atlas Icon
*****
Posts: 13,504
United States


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #29153 on: Today at 06:30:09 AM »


Wow the UK coming out of the blue with this
Logged
Woody
SirWoodbury
Junior Chimp
*****
Posts: 6,139


Political Matrix
E: 1.48, S: 1.30

Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #29154 on: Today at 07:14:17 AM »

Logged
Woody
SirWoodbury
Junior Chimp
*****
Posts: 6,139


Political Matrix
E: 1.48, S: 1.30

Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #29155 on: Today at 07:15:28 AM »
« Edited: Today at 07:20:07 AM by Woody »

I feel like the AFU high command decided they are willing to sacrifice some swath of land in Kharkov to maintain the front in Donetsk. Which is reasonable considering the Russians can't take Kharkov city, and the Donetsk urban sprawl is the best blockage to stop a Russian offensive
The consensus is that Russia wants to advance far enough that Kharkov City is within artillery range, and at the same time maintain a buffer zone.

Logged
Hindsight was 2020
Hindsight is 2020
Atlas Icon
*****
Posts: 13,504
United States


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #29156 on: Today at 08:13:45 AM »


😬 🔥
Logged
Pages: 1 ... 1162 1163 1164 1165 1166 [1167]  
« previous next »
Jump to:  


Login with username, password and session length

Terms of Service - DMCA Agent and Policy - Privacy Policy and Cookies

Powered by SMF 1.1.21 | SMF © 2015, Simple Machines

Page created in 0.212 seconds with 11 queries.