This Once Great Movement Of Ours (user search)
       |           

Welcome, Guest. Please login or register.
May 18, 2024, 06:26:43 AM
News: Election Simulator 2.0 Released. Senate/Gubernatorial maps, proportional electoral votes, and more - Read more

  Talk Elections
  General Politics
  International General Discussion (Moderators: afleitch, Hash)
  This Once Great Movement Of Ours (search mode)
Pages: 1 2 3 4 5 6 [7] 8 9 10 11 12 ... 35
Author Topic: This Once Great Movement Of Ours  (Read 155589 times)
CumbrianLefty
CumbrianLeftie
Atlas Icon
*****
Posts: 11,985
United Kingdom


« Reply #150 on: December 26, 2020, 11:58:59 AM »

We shall see, but I think most Labour MPs will do as the leadership says.
Logged
CumbrianLefty
CumbrianLeftie
Atlas Icon
*****
Posts: 11,985
United Kingdom


« Reply #151 on: December 29, 2020, 06:43:57 AM »

A figure of 20 Labour MPs going against the whip now being mentioned.

Which wouldn't be that many compared to the A50 vote for instance.
Logged
CumbrianLefty
CumbrianLeftie
Atlas Icon
*****
Posts: 11,985
United Kingdom


« Reply #152 on: December 30, 2020, 08:44:31 AM »

Hmmm, not completely sure about that personally. At the very least, some in the 2017 and 2019 MP intakes appear decent and will be promoted in due course.

And there's no denying that in its governing years the PLP attracted some truly horrific and principle free empty shell careerists - maybe one of Corbyn's actual "achievements" (even if inadvertent) was getting several of the very worst of these out of the Commons.
Logged
CumbrianLefty
CumbrianLeftie
Atlas Icon
*****
Posts: 11,985
United Kingdom


« Reply #153 on: December 30, 2020, 01:21:04 PM »

I think the 2005 intake also wasn't great in that regard.
Logged
CumbrianLefty
CumbrianLeftie
Atlas Icon
*****
Posts: 11,985
United Kingdom


« Reply #154 on: December 31, 2020, 08:04:27 AM »

A figure of 20 Labour MPs going against the whip now being mentioned.

Which wouldn't be that many compared to the A50 vote for instance.

In the end it was 36 abstentions (though a few may have been "officially" approved) and just one Labour MP (representing Streatham, probably the most pro-remain seat in the UK) voting against.

Only three junior front benchers quitting though, something I expect Starmer can live with.
Logged
CumbrianLefty
CumbrianLeftie
Atlas Icon
*****
Posts: 11,985
United Kingdom


« Reply #155 on: January 01, 2021, 07:36:36 AM »


That description of Pat McFadden - genuine LOL Smiley
Logged
CumbrianLefty
CumbrianLeftie
Atlas Icon
*****
Posts: 11,985
United Kingdom


« Reply #156 on: January 07, 2021, 09:57:26 AM »

OK then to revive this thread, anybody who hasn't seen (the ex Labour MP, and on topic from the previous posts a member of the 2005 GE intake) Ian Austin's tweets on yesterday's events in the US should do so. They are genuine "things of beauty".
Logged
CumbrianLefty
CumbrianLeftie
Atlas Icon
*****
Posts: 11,985
United Kingdom


« Reply #157 on: January 10, 2021, 07:46:00 AM »

He was still at it yesterday, incredibly.
Logged
CumbrianLefty
CumbrianLeftie
Atlas Icon
*****
Posts: 11,985
United Kingdom


« Reply #158 on: January 10, 2021, 08:31:25 AM »

And it could be mentioned in this context that Ian Austin was a "Brownite" back in the day (along with such other unmitigated horrors as Chris Leslie and Michael Dugher)
Logged
CumbrianLefty
CumbrianLeftie
Atlas Icon
*****
Posts: 11,985
United Kingdom


« Reply #159 on: January 11, 2021, 07:06:45 AM »

He was still at it yesterday, incredibly.

And he has now got a piece in the Currant Bun out of it!

An almost impressive level of grift.
Logged
CumbrianLefty
CumbrianLeftie
Atlas Icon
*****
Posts: 11,985
United Kingdom


« Reply #160 on: January 12, 2021, 10:13:24 AM »

Though that is about one third of the turnout in Unite's last GS election!
Logged
CumbrianLefty
CumbrianLeftie
Atlas Icon
*****
Posts: 11,985
United Kingdom


« Reply #161 on: January 13, 2021, 09:45:06 AM »

IMO having FPTP for these elections is nonsensical as well.
Logged
CumbrianLefty
CumbrianLeftie
Atlas Icon
*****
Posts: 11,985
United Kingdom


« Reply #162 on: January 14, 2021, 09:26:58 AM »

Depressingly, you are both very likely correct.
Logged
CumbrianLefty
CumbrianLeftie
Atlas Icon
*****
Posts: 11,985
United Kingdom


« Reply #163 on: January 14, 2021, 12:04:53 PM »

Not sure I agree, it was IMO important for him to see that coup off and go at a time more of his own choosing - have had a hunch this might happen for a while now.

It might not be a game *changer*, no - but maybe nothing SLab could do would be.

(the coming SNP civil war between Nicola's people and Alex's, on the other hand......)
Logged
CumbrianLefty
CumbrianLeftie
Atlas Icon
*****
Posts: 11,985
United Kingdom


« Reply #164 on: January 18, 2021, 07:34:10 AM »

And, lets not forget, ran one of the worst leadership campaigns by anyone anywhere ever.
Logged
CumbrianLefty
CumbrianLeftie
Atlas Icon
*****
Posts: 11,985
United Kingdom


« Reply #165 on: January 18, 2021, 10:34:16 AM »

Personally, I disagree.

Burnham after all beat Cooper despite the left wing vote going to Corbyn almost wholesale, and both campaigns had more substance to them (admittedly not difficult) - Kendall in particular wasn't scared to take actual positions. Its just that the vast majority of members didn't want what she was selling.
Logged
CumbrianLefty
CumbrianLeftie
Atlas Icon
*****
Posts: 11,985
United Kingdom


« Reply #166 on: January 19, 2021, 06:44:23 AM »

I always assumed it was an effort by the ultras on the right to stop Chukka- who was seen as the moderniser in the race but funnily enough was seen as too left wing by some due to his connection with Ed M and the fact that he actually beat the right to win the streatham selection (he beat noted leftist Steve Reed- isn't Labour politics brilliant at times?)

My recollection is a bit different tbh - Chuka was going to be the mega-Blairite candidate (infamously he gave a TV interview the weekend after the GE basically renouncing his previous support for the soft left and Miliband, and saying Labour needed to appeal to "successful" people - never mind the clear implication that the only people who had just voted for it were miserable failures) and stunts like visits to Swindon and Nuneaton were part of this. Kendall meanwhile, in the literal first few days, actually positioned herself as a sort of "unity" candidate - promoting change but going big on her support for unions for example (and picking up the support of some soft left people as well as on the right) Then came Umunna's sudden - and never fully explained - withdrawal, and her campaign suddenly (and ultimately disastrously) lurched to the right to fill the perceived gap.

You are right that she is a likeable person, and she actually showed that during the contest despite the terrible political positioning (she responded with good humour to some really vile personal attacks online from purported left wingers, for example) I actually put her 2nd behind Burnham for that Smiley
Logged
CumbrianLefty
CumbrianLeftie
Atlas Icon
*****
Posts: 11,985
United Kingdom


« Reply #167 on: January 20, 2021, 09:14:33 AM »

I know the sins of the father shouldn't count, but has Anas ever discussed Senior's interesting overseas career?

Reading his wiki, this is bad enough:

Quote
Sarwar is a supporter of Glasgow football teams Celtic[34] and Rangers.[34]

Suprised he didn't chuck in Partick Thistle as well tbph.
Logged
CumbrianLefty
CumbrianLeftie
Atlas Icon
*****
Posts: 11,985
United Kingdom


« Reply #168 on: January 21, 2021, 01:17:17 PM »

Looks like a clean sweep for the leadership in the various NEC sub committees.

Starmermania!!
Logged
CumbrianLefty
CumbrianLeftie
Atlas Icon
*****
Posts: 11,985
United Kingdom


« Reply #169 on: January 22, 2021, 08:39:36 AM »

Quite a few who backed Leonard last time seem to be supporting Sarwar now.
Logged
CumbrianLefty
CumbrianLeftie
Atlas Icon
*****
Posts: 11,985
United Kingdom


« Reply #170 on: January 27, 2021, 09:35:01 AM »

Meanwhile, some truly "laying it on with a trowel" expectation management about this May's elections by "Labour sources" has caused a bit of amusement. It is true that the absence of any "real votes" at all for nearly a year (save a few Scottish council byelections) makes forecasting these things even more hazardous than usual, but what was being "predicted" would actually be one of the party's worst electoral showings ever - and far more than any possible "vaccine boost" for the Tories could provide.

So draw your own conclusions......
Logged
CumbrianLefty
CumbrianLeftie
Atlas Icon
*****
Posts: 11,985
United Kingdom


« Reply #171 on: January 28, 2021, 09:25:37 AM »

Saying the Tories will be "destroyed" does also suggest a bit of pre-emptive spin tbph Smiley
Logged
CumbrianLefty
CumbrianLeftie
Atlas Icon
*****
Posts: 11,985
United Kingdom


« Reply #172 on: January 29, 2021, 05:53:50 AM »

"bUt StArMeR iS mOrE rIgHt WiNg ThAn BlAiR!!!!!!?Huh!!!!1111!!!!!!"
Logged
CumbrianLefty
CumbrianLeftie
Atlas Icon
*****
Posts: 11,985
United Kingdom


« Reply #173 on: January 29, 2021, 08:24:27 AM »

Saying the Tories will be "destroyed" does also suggest a bit of pre-emptive spin tbph Smiley
I have no reason to 'spin' though.  I genuinely think we will be walloped.

Compare polling now to when the last time these seats were up for election.

That certainly applies to the seats last fought in 2017, but with those from a year earlier a bit less.
Logged
CumbrianLefty
CumbrianLeftie
Atlas Icon
*****
Posts: 11,985
United Kingdom


« Reply #174 on: January 29, 2021, 01:06:46 PM »

Though that applies both ways - eg I will be surprised if Sandwell is still a one party state after May.
Logged
Pages: 1 2 3 4 5 6 [7] 8 9 10 11 12 ... 35  
Jump to:  


Login with username, password and session length

Terms of Service - DMCA Agent and Policy - Privacy Policy and Cookies

Powered by SMF 1.1.21 | SMF © 2015, Simple Machines

Page created in 0.038 seconds with 10 queries.