Republican National Convention **live commentary thread** (user search)
       |           

Welcome, Guest. Please login or register.
Did you miss your activation email?
May 17, 2024, 05:47:20 AM
News: Election Simulator 2.0 Released. Senate/Gubernatorial maps, proportional electoral votes, and more - Read more

  Talk Elections
  Election Archive
  Election Archive
  2016 U.S. Presidential Election
  Republican National Convention **live commentary thread** (search mode)
Pages: [1]
Author Topic: Republican National Convention **live commentary thread**  (Read 101279 times)
JerryArkansas
jerryarkansas
YaBB God
*****
Posts: 4,535
United States


« on: July 18, 2016, 07:38:48 PM »


So she has a good explanation for being crazy. Doesn't change the facts.
Facts? Were you in the room when Hillary! told her what she did? Seems like you are calling Mrs. Smith a liar.

Good job, you figured it out. She's a liar.
Doubtful. Mrs. Smith lost her son.

Hillary! and Obama had the election at stake.

Who has more motive to lie here?
The woman who wants answers as to why her son died.  When in grief, one wants to believe any lie that is feed to them, just like her when it comes to republicans.
Logged
JerryArkansas
jerryarkansas
YaBB God
*****
Posts: 4,535
United States


« Reply #1 on: July 18, 2016, 07:46:12 PM »


So she has a good explanation for being crazy. Doesn't change the facts.
Facts? Were you in the room when Hillary! told her what she did? Seems like you are calling Mrs. Smith a liar.

Good job, you figured it out. She's a liar.
Doubtful. Mrs. Smith lost her son.

Hillary! and Obama had the election at stake.

Who has more motive to lie here?
The woman who wants answers as to why her son died.  When in grief, one wants to believe any lie that is feed to them, just like her when it comes to republicans.
Fed to her? Hillary! told her this... Not hearsay. A direct quote. She wanted answers, Hillary! lied and stonewalled.
No she didn't.  I love how you keep going on that lie that she keeps telling.  So very fun and stupid of you. 
Logged
JerryArkansas
jerryarkansas
YaBB God
*****
Posts: 4,535
United States


« Reply #2 on: July 18, 2016, 07:49:41 PM »


So she has a good explanation for being crazy. Doesn't change the facts.
Facts? Were you in the room when Hillary! told her what she did? Seems like you are calling Mrs. Smith a liar.

Good job, you figured it out. She's a liar.
Doubtful. Mrs. Smith lost her son.

Hillary! and Obama had the election at stake.

Who has more motive to lie here?
The woman who wants answers as to why her son died.  When in grief, one wants to believe any lie that is feed to them, just like her when it comes to republicans.
Fed to her? Hillary! told her this... Not hearsay. A direct quote. She wanted answers, Hillary! lied and stonewalled.
No she didn't.  I love how you keep going on that lie that she keeps telling.  So very fun and stupid of you. 
And what's your basis for knowing better than someone who was actually in the conversation?
Someone who has been a prop for the far right for the past 4 years.  She's even less credible than you on the subject.  And as others have said, she is the only one saying this, no other family.

Really, it is a shameful thing that this woman who is clearly not coping with the death of her son, and is being used by a political party for partisan gain. 
Logged
JerryArkansas
jerryarkansas
YaBB God
*****
Posts: 4,535
United States


« Reply #3 on: July 18, 2016, 07:59:07 PM »


So she has a good explanation for being crazy. Doesn't change the facts.
Facts? Were you in the room when Hillary! told her what she did? Seems like you are calling Mrs. Smith a liar.

Good job, you figured it out. She's a liar.
Doubtful. Mrs. Smith lost her son.

Hillary! and Obama had the election at stake.

Who has more motive to lie here?

How do you explain the other people in the room who say Hillary didn't say what Pat said she did? Cherryl Bennet, mother of Tyrone Woods, said that no video was mentioned.
Gee, is it possible, just possible that these were private conversations between the Smith family and Hillary?

Kate Quigley, Jan Stevens, and Barabara Doherty never heard a video mentioned. What Doherty did remember was that Clinton was "sincere and crying." Why would Clinton only tell Smith that a video was the cause?
She didn't JUST tell Mrs. Smith.

From your own sourcing:

Charles Woods, father of CIA operative Tyrone Woods, told talk show host Glenn Beck on Oct. 25, 2012, that Clinton said to him, "We will make sure that the person who made that film is arrested and prosecuted."

Yet this conflicts with the other four people mentioned above. The two people who do say they remember a video being mentioned have either appeared on conservative radio or conservative television to say something bad about a liberal, even though what they're saying doesn't line up with what everybody else said.
I.E. either four family were bought off by the President and Hillary to lie about there private conversations, or these two are grief stricken and put the blame on someone who had nothing to do with what happened.  And the Latter is obviously the more credible.
Logged
JerryArkansas
jerryarkansas
YaBB God
*****
Posts: 4,535
United States


« Reply #4 on: July 18, 2016, 08:22:29 PM »

I guess some people are scared of the truth.

Including the multiple Republican posters (Inks, outofbox6, Brown Line) that are saying tonight is disturbing?
Yep, Republicans can be scared of the truth too. I wouldn't really consider them Republicans when they spend more time bashing the party then supporting it.
It seems to me the only one who is scared of the truth is you.  Being scared in your boots and loving on the racist xenophobe like a damn calf on its mother.  Eating every lie he gives you.  That what is sad tonight.  Not us calling out this con man, but those of you who are eating it up with glee.
Logged
JerryArkansas
jerryarkansas
YaBB God
*****
Posts: 4,535
United States


« Reply #5 on: July 18, 2016, 08:23:53 PM »

Hopefully this convention helps Americans realize the stakes of this election. This party is unhinged.

And your party is about to nominate a criminal
No charges were ever given to her, unlike your nominee who is on trial for fraud.
Logged
JerryArkansas
jerryarkansas
YaBB God
*****
Posts: 4,535
United States


« Reply #6 on: July 18, 2016, 08:28:40 PM »

Hopefully this convention helps Americans realize the stakes of this election. This party is unhinged.

And your party is about to nominate a criminal
No charges were ever given to her, unlike your nominee who is on trial for fraud.

Refer to my post that started this page
A Republican Bush administration chastised her, in one of the most unprofessional manners ever done by a Director of the FBI, something even Hover didn't do.  Yeah, really damning.
Logged
JerryArkansas
jerryarkansas
YaBB God
*****
Posts: 4,535
United States


« Reply #7 on: July 18, 2016, 08:30:12 PM »

Hopefully this convention helps Americans realize the stakes of this election. This party is unhinged.

And your party is about to nominate a criminal
No charges were ever given to her, unlike your nominee who is on trial for fraud.
Trump is not "on trial for fraud." It's a civil suit, not a criminal one.
If guilty, he has to pay out a sh**t ton of money.  And trial is a all around term, not just for criminal suits dumbass.
Logged
Pages: [1]  
Jump to:  


Login with username, password and session length

Terms of Service - DMCA Agent and Policy - Privacy Policy and Cookies

Powered by SMF 1.1.21 | SMF © 2015, Simple Machines

Page created in 0.033 seconds with 11 queries.