If you shift every state to their vote relative to the nation, simulating a 49%/49%/2% popular result, you get this:
That doesn't look much like a 2000-2016 map to me.
Democrats would have been much better off creating the coalition this map shows than chasing southern votes for another quarter century.
If Roe v Wade had never happened the following year, the New Deal Coalition probably could have been rebuilt, and you'd have a much broader battleground. Things were better off when voters in places like Texas and Tennessee mattered.
I'd rather have an alignment with 35 battleground states than one with 10. Regardless of who is winning elections, that's healthier for the nation as a whole.