PA-Franklin & Marshall College: Obama+9
       |           

Welcome, Guest. Please login or register.
Did you miss your activation email?
May 07, 2024, 04:30:44 AM
News: Election Simulator 2.0 Released. Senate/Gubernatorial maps, proportional electoral votes, and more - Read more

  Talk Elections
  Election Archive
  Election Archive
  2012 Elections
  2012 U.S. Presidential General Election Polls
  PA-Franklin & Marshall College: Obama+9
« previous next »
Pages: [1] 2
Author Topic: PA-Franklin & Marshall College: Obama+9  (Read 2804 times)
Tender Branson
Mark Warner 08
Atlas Institution
*****
Posts: 58,179
Austria


Political Matrix
E: -6.06, S: -4.84

Show only this user's posts in this thread
« on: September 26, 2012, 03:10:49 AM »

Remember, this is the only poll that J.J. trusts in Pennsylvania, so this is important:

52-43 Obama (likely voters)
50-39 Obama (registered voters)

Obama led by 6 percentage points in an August F&M poll of registered voters.

Casey led Republican Senate nominee Tom Smith by a 46 percent to 34 percent margin. Among likely voters, Casey's lead narrowed to 48 percent to 38 percent. In the same August F&M poll, Casey also led Smith by 12 points among registered voters.

Pennsylvanians see both Democrats more favorably. Half of voters surveyed (50 percent) said their opinion of Obama was strongly or somewhat favorable with more than two in five voters (42 percent) saying they view him strongly or somewhat unfavorably.

Only about a third (34 percent) had a favorable view of Romney compared to more than half (53 percent) who have an unfavorable view.

Almost two in five voters (37 percent) had a favorable view of Casey with less than a third (29 percent) having an unfavorable view.

Only a fifth (20 percent) had a favorable view of Smith with about the same number (18 percent) having an unfavorable view. His bigger problem is more than three in five voters (62 percent) are still undecided or don't know enough about him.

The poll surveyed 632 registered voters between Sept. 18 and Sunday and has a margin of error of plus or minus 3.9 percentage points. The sample of 392 likely voters has a margin of error of plus or minus 4.9 points.

http://republicanherald.com/news/pa-voters-displeased-with-job-performance-of-obama-casey-but-prefer-them-to-rivals-1.1378892
Logged
NVGonzalez
antwnzrr
Jr. Member
***
Posts: 1,687
Mexico


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #1 on: September 26, 2012, 03:15:52 AM »

PA is losing its swing state status.
Logged
Eraserhead
Atlas Legend
*****
Posts: 44,548
United States


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #2 on: September 26, 2012, 04:21:36 AM »


It never had it this year.
Logged
sg0508
Sr. Member
****
Posts: 2,061
United States


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #3 on: September 26, 2012, 08:07:15 AM »

Keep in mind, there was a very small chance Romney was going to carry PA anyhow.  Actually, I'm not even sure why anyone really considers it a toss-up to begin with.  It hasn't gone to the GOP since '88 and outside of maybe '04, it wasn't that close in any other year.
Logged
J. J.
Atlas Superstar
*****
Posts: 32,892
United States


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #4 on: September 26, 2012, 08:18:15 AM »

It is probably the best poll for PA, but they are noted for not pushing, and getting a high undecided (that breaks down the same way).  My guess is 44% to 56%.
Logged
Badger
badger
Atlas Legend
*****
Posts: 40,358
United States


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #5 on: September 26, 2012, 08:31:30 AM »
« Edited: September 26, 2012, 08:55:52 AM by Badger »

Keep in mind, there was a very small chance Romney was going to carry PA anyhow.  Actually, I'm not even sure why anyone really considers it a toss-up to begin with.  It hasn't gone to the GOP since '88 and outside of maybe '04, it wasn't that close in any other year.

It was close in 2000 also. This is the first time in 40 years the state isn't seriously contested.
Logged
J. J.
Atlas Superstar
*****
Posts: 32,892
United States


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #6 on: September 26, 2012, 09:12:20 AM »

Keep in mind, there was a very small chance Romney was going to carry PA anyhow.  Actually, I'm not even sure why anyone really considers it a toss-up to begin with.  It hasn't gone to the GOP since '88 and outside of maybe '04, it wasn't that close in any other year.

It was close in 2000 also. This is the first time in 40 years the state isn't seriously contested.

Well, in all fairness, McCain in 2008 shouldn't have been contesting it.  It was not close in 1992 and 1996.
Logged
Wisconsin+17
Ben Kenobi
Junior Chimp
*****
Posts: 6,134
United States


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #7 on: September 26, 2012, 09:15:53 AM »

Quote
You must be logged in to read this quote.

It's a good thing we didn't select this man, eh?
Logged
J. J.
Atlas Superstar
*****
Posts: 32,892
United States


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #8 on: September 26, 2012, 09:24:38 AM »

Remember, this is the only poll that J.J. trusts in Pennsylvania, so this is important:



Only university poll that I trust for PA.  They do get it right.  I believe them.
Logged
Craigo
Rookie
**
Posts: 169
Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #9 on: September 26, 2012, 09:46:06 AM »

Remember, this is the only poll that J.J. trusts in Pennsylvania, so this is important:



Only university poll that I trust for PA.  They do get it right.  I believe them.

There aren't any university polls I distrust in PA, and I'm a former Pennsylvania pollster (who's never worked for a university).
Logged
Craigo
Rookie
**
Posts: 169
Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #10 on: September 26, 2012, 09:48:05 AM »

Quote
You must be logged in to read this quote.

It's a good thing we didn't select this man, eh?

The guy who lost by 18 his last time out? Yeah, probably a good thing.
Logged
Franzl
Atlas Star
*****
Posts: 22,254
Germany


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #11 on: September 26, 2012, 09:49:47 AM »

Keep in mind, there was a very small chance Romney was going to carry PA anyhow.  Actually, I'm not even sure why anyone really considers it a toss-up to begin with.  It hasn't gone to the GOP since '88 and outside of maybe '04, it wasn't that close in any other year.

It was close in 2000 also. This is the first time in 40 years the state isn't seriously contested.

Well, in all fairness, McCain in 2008 shouldn't have been contesting it.  It was not close in 1992 and 1996.

Says the person that insisted Obama would win Pennsylvania by 1%.
Logged
Snowstalker Mk. II
Snowstalker
Atlas Star
*****
Posts: 20,414
Palestinian Territory, Occupied


Political Matrix
E: -7.10, S: -4.35

P P P
Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #12 on: September 26, 2012, 12:04:43 PM »

F&M is a good pollster. The school's a good one and only about 15 minutes from where I live; it's one of my top colleges that I'd like to attend.
Logged
ElectionAtlas
Atlas Proginator
YaBB God
*****
Posts: 3,629
United States


P P P
WWW Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #13 on: September 26, 2012, 01:52:12 PM »

New Poll: Pennsylvania President by Franklin and Marshall College on 2012-09-24

Summary: D: 52%, R: 43%, I: 2%, U: 3%

Poll Source URL: Full Poll Details

Logged
J. J.
Atlas Superstar
*****
Posts: 32,892
United States


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #14 on: September 26, 2012, 02:32:13 PM »

Keep in mind, there was a very small chance Romney was going to carry PA anyhow.  Actually, I'm not even sure why anyone really considers it a toss-up to begin with.  It hasn't gone to the GOP since '88 and outside of maybe '04, it wasn't that close in any other year.

It was close in 2000 also. This is the first time in 40 years the state isn't seriously contested.

Well, in all fairness, McCain in 2008 shouldn't have been contesting it.  It was not close in 1992 and 1996.

Says the person that insisted Obama would win Pennsylvania by 1%.

I thought it would be less, but not quite by one point.
Logged
J. J.
Atlas Superstar
*****
Posts: 32,892
United States


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #15 on: September 26, 2012, 02:35:47 PM »

F&M is a good pollster. The school's a good one and only about 15 minutes from where I live; it's one of my top colleges that I'd like to attend.

Terry Madonna, the guy who does it, it a great pollster.  He was at Millersville until the mid 2000's but he was always good.  If he'd switch to another school, that would be the best uni poll for PA.
Logged
Franzl
Atlas Star
*****
Posts: 22,254
Germany


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #16 on: September 26, 2012, 03:56:38 PM »

Keep in mind, there was a very small chance Romney was going to carry PA anyhow.  Actually, I'm not even sure why anyone really considers it a toss-up to begin with.  It hasn't gone to the GOP since '88 and outside of maybe '04, it wasn't that close in any other year.

It was close in 2000 also. This is the first time in 40 years the state isn't seriously contested.

Well, in all fairness, McCain in 2008 shouldn't have been contesting it.  It was not close in 1992 and 1996.

Says the person that insisted Obama would win Pennsylvania by 1%.

I thought it would be less, but not quite by one point.

You remember (or want to remember?) incorrectly:

I'm predicting Obama, but by 1.5 points, in PA.
Logged
ajb
Jr. Member
***
Posts: 869
United States


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #17 on: September 26, 2012, 04:05:54 PM »

Keep in mind, there was a very small chance Romney was going to carry PA anyhow.  Actually, I'm not even sure why anyone really considers it a toss-up to begin with.  It hasn't gone to the GOP since '88 and outside of maybe '04, it wasn't that close in any other year.

It was close in 2000 also. This is the first time in 40 years the state isn't seriously contested.

Well, in all fairness, McCain in 2008 shouldn't have been contesting it.  It was not close in 1992 and 1996.

Says the person that insisted Obama would win Pennsylvania by 1%.

I thought it would be less, but not quite by one point.

You remember (or want to remember?) incorrectly:

I'm predicting Obama, but by 1.5 points, in PA.
To be fair, that's "not quite by one point."
Logged
J. J.
Atlas Superstar
*****
Posts: 32,892
United States


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #18 on: September 26, 2012, 05:34:22 PM »

Keep in mind, there was a very small chance Romney was going to carry PA anyhow.  Actually, I'm not even sure why anyone really considers it a toss-up to begin with.  It hasn't gone to the GOP since '88 and outside of maybe '04, it wasn't that close in any other year.

It was close in 2000 also. This is the first time in 40 years the state isn't seriously contested.

Well, in all fairness, McCain in 2008 shouldn't have been contesting it.  It was not close in 1992 and 1996.

Says the person that insisted Obama would win Pennsylvania by 1%.

I thought it would be less, but not quite by one point.

You remember (or want to remember?) incorrectly:

I'm predicting Obama, but by 1.5 points, in PA.

A month out, but the polling showed Obama was winning it.
Logged
Franzl
Atlas Star
*****
Posts: 22,254
Germany


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #19 on: September 26, 2012, 05:38:38 PM »

You kept insisting that margin until Election Day. Remember...Bradley Effect!!!
Logged
Landslide Lyndon
px75
Atlas Star
*****
Posts: 26,913
Greece


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #20 on: September 26, 2012, 05:58:20 PM »

You kept insisting that margin until Election Day. Remember...Bradley Effect!!!

It's easier to make Pope renounce his infallibility than JJ.
Logged
Franzl
Atlas Star
*****
Posts: 22,254
Germany


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #21 on: September 26, 2012, 06:02:41 PM »

You kept insisting that margin until Election Day. Remember...Bradley Effect!!!

It's easier to make Pope renounce his infallibility than JJ.

And the Pope is right more often.
Logged
Ty440
GoldenBoy
Jr. Member
***
Posts: 668
United States


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #22 on: September 26, 2012, 08:19:53 PM »

Krazen oh Krazen, where art thou?


I must admit i miss reading his lunacy....lol
Logged
J. J.
Atlas Superstar
*****
Posts: 32,892
United States


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #23 on: September 26, 2012, 08:35:32 PM »

You kept insisting that margin until Election Day. Remember...Bradley Effect!!!

No, but I did think it would be lower than the polling in PA, and expressed surprise when they were right on.  I've made the point that they were dead on in PA many times since.
Logged
Mister Twister
Jr. Member
***
Posts: 511


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #24 on: September 26, 2012, 08:41:00 PM »

Does anyone who lives in Pennsylvania know why Obama appears to be polling better than Casey all of the sudden?
Logged
Pages: [1] 2  
« previous next »
Jump to:  


Login with username, password and session length

Terms of Service - DMCA Agent and Policy - Privacy Policy and Cookies

Powered by SMF 1.1.21 | SMF © 2015, Simple Machines

Page created in 0.056 seconds with 14 queries.