VA: Rasmussen: Obama and Romney Close in Virginia (user search)
       |           

Welcome, Guest. Please login or register.
Did you miss your activation email?
May 17, 2024, 05:26:26 AM
News: Election Simulator 2.0 Released. Senate/Gubernatorial maps, proportional electoral votes, and more - Read more

  Talk Elections
  Election Archive
  Election Archive
  2012 Elections
  2012 U.S. Presidential General Election Polls
  VA: Rasmussen: Obama and Romney Close in Virginia (search mode)
Pages: [1]
Author Topic: VA: Rasmussen: Obama and Romney Close in Virginia  (Read 6159 times)
Ljube
Junior Chimp
*****
Posts: 6,067
Political Matrix
E: 2.71, S: -6.09

« on: November 05, 2012, 10:11:52 AM »

Whites breaking 65-35 Romney seems about right.

And I do think he is gaining with Hispanics.
Logged
Ljube
Junior Chimp
*****
Posts: 6,067
Political Matrix
E: 2.71, S: -6.09

« Reply #1 on: November 05, 2012, 10:30:40 AM »

Rasmussen is the only poll to have Obama down in Virginia over this past week.
Glorious, Glorious, Glorious news. One of the most reliable pollsters in the 2008 election cycle understands that a uniform national swing will translate on the state level.

Go Mitt, go!

Do me a favor and go back to our 2008 polling page. Look at Rasmussen's final polls:

Colorado: Rasmussen (O +4 ) Final Result: (O + 9)
Nevada: Rasmussen (O + 4) Final Result: (O + 12)
Wisconsin: Rasmussen ( O + 7) Final Result: (O + 14)
Ohio: Rasmussen (Tie) Final Result: (O + 5)
Florida: Rasmussen (M + 1) Final Result: (O + 3)
Virginia: Rasmussen (O + 4) Final Result: (O + 6)
North Carolina: Rasmussen (M + 1) Final Result: (O + 1)
New Hampshire: Rasmussen (O + 4) Final Result: (O + 9)

What was that about reliable??


They were using the wrong 2004 turnout model and came up with ridiculous results.

The same thing can happen to PPP this time.
Logged
Ljube
Junior Chimp
*****
Posts: 6,067
Political Matrix
E: 2.71, S: -6.09

« Reply #2 on: November 05, 2012, 10:41:27 AM »

Rasmussen is the only poll to have Obama down in Virginia over this past week.
Glorious, Glorious, Glorious news. One of the most reliable pollsters in the 2008 election cycle understands that a uniform national swing will translate on the state level.

Go Mitt, go!

Do me a favor and go back to our 2008 polling page. Look at Rasmussen's final polls:

Colorado: Rasmussen (O +4 ) Final Result: (O + 9)
Nevada: Rasmussen (O + 4) Final Result: (O + 12)
Wisconsin: Rasmussen ( O + 7) Final Result: (O + 14)
Ohio: Rasmussen (Tie) Final Result: (O + 5)
Florida: Rasmussen (M + 1) Final Result: (O + 3)
Virginia: Rasmussen (O + 4) Final Result: (O + 6)
North Carolina: Rasmussen (M + 1) Final Result: (O + 1)
New Hampshire: Rasmussen (O + 4) Final Result: (O + 9)

What was that about reliable??


They were using the wrong 2004 turnout model and came up with ridiculous results.

The same thing can happen to PPP this time.


Is there any logical reason to accept Ras and drop PPP?  Ras had an terribly bad R house effect in 2010.   PPP, believe or not, leaned slightly R last time around.  Ras is basically the only poll that has Romney leading anywhere other than NC and FL. 


It depends on whether we wish to predict the outcome correctly, or stick to the known, previously accurate pollster.

I’m not objective here, because I hope Romney will win and no matter how much I try, some of that hope is projected onto my reasoning.

But look at CNN for instance. They seem to have chosen the middle road between PPP and Rasmussen. The reason – to minimize their error.

Logged
Pages: [1]  
Jump to:  


Login with username, password and session length

Terms of Service - DMCA Agent and Policy - Privacy Policy and Cookies

Powered by SMF 1.1.21 | SMF © 2015, Simple Machines

Page created in 0.023 seconds with 13 queries.