I think what's being applied here is perception that Hillary/the left framing the conversation of gangs as an alternative to family. By saying "Joining A Gang Is Like Having A Family" is really making seem as if its justified. Gangs like(cripps,bloods) claim the same "family" banner , yet they are really just criminal enterprises that take advantage of the weak that ironically come from broken family structure. This isn't like the mafia of the 1970s -1980s either.
Of course the white liberal left could careless because more black men in gangs means more inner city crime and democratic votes.
No, that is not THEIR framing. That's YOUR framing. She was observing a trivial fact - people pick gangs as an alternative to family. Understanding peoples' motivations is important if you actually care about addressing it. Do you?