NH-GBA Strategies: Hassan +3 (user search)
       |           

Welcome, Guest. Please login or register.
May 18, 2024, 10:50:35 PM
News: Election Simulator 2.0 Released. Senate/Gubernatorial maps, proportional electoral votes, and more - Read more

  Talk Elections
  Election Archive
  Election Archive
  2016 Senatorial Election Polls
  NH-GBA Strategies: Hassan +3 (search mode)
Pages: [1]
Author Topic: NH-GBA Strategies: Hassan +3  (Read 716 times)
Xing
xingkerui
Atlas Superstar
*****
Posts: 30,299
United States


Political Matrix
E: -6.52, S: -3.91

P P P
« on: September 29, 2016, 03:11:30 PM »

SafeTilt D, nothingplenty to see here. Republicans should focus on races that are actually competitive, e.g. this one, unless they want to lose the Senate and give up on a winnable Gubernatorial race.
Logged
Xing
xingkerui
Atlas Superstar
*****
Posts: 30,299
United States


Political Matrix
E: -6.52, S: -3.91

P P P
« Reply #1 on: September 29, 2016, 03:32:09 PM »

SafeTilt D, nothingplenty to see here. Republicans should focus on races that are actually competitive, e.g. this one, unless they want to lose the Senate and give up on a winnable Gubernatorial race.

Of course Democrats like YOU want the GOP to waste money in NH. Tongue IN, PA, NV, MO, NC and LA are the races to watch.

LA is not competitive unless Kennedy fails to make the run-off. Even then, I expect whichever Republican that does to win. If Republicans concede this race, that's three seats that are gone for them, which would give them very little leeway, considering that Toomey and Young are behind, NV's going to be NV, and Burr is only slightly ahead in NC. If they give up here, the Democrats are the clear favorites to win the Senate.
Logged
Pages: [1]  
Jump to:  


Login with username, password and session length

Terms of Service - DMCA Agent and Policy - Privacy Policy and Cookies

Powered by SMF 1.1.21 | SMF © 2015, Simple Machines

Page created in 0.025 seconds with 11 queries.