Missouri Man Charged with spreading HIV to over 300 people

[Jordan]

Sickening

[Jordan]

There was no malicious intent. 15 years per victim is a crime in and of itself and this will only serve to further stigmatize those living with HIV.

What?

You must be logged in to read this quote.

You must be logged in to read this quote.

You must be logged in to read this quote.

[Jordan]

You must be logged in to read this quote.

I'd sure want to know if someone I'm having sex with has any transferable diseases, protected sex or not.

[Jordan]

Sickening

What's sickening?  The fact the title of this thread is a lie or the fact as usual the forum either a) didn't read the story or b) got sex ed in Texas and is clueless about STIs?

I have no idea how the OP came to his ludicrous conclusion and I am amazed that everyone else just shrugged their shoulders and went along with it.  Worst part is most of the offenders are red avatars.  Guys actually read the articles and if you don't understand them please ask someone to explain them instead of just going into infantile hysterics.  This stuff is serious and irrational fear mongering is what allowed the HIV epidemic to get out of control in the US in the first place.

Yes, I think that someone who lies about having AIDS and then proceeds to have sex with that person is sickening.

[Jordan]

Sickening

What's sickening?  The fact the title of this thread is a lie or the fact as usual the forum either a) didn't read the story or b) got sex ed in Texas and is clueless about STIs?

I have no idea how the OP came to his ludicrous conclusion and I am amazed that everyone else just shrugged their shoulders and went along with it.  Worst part is most of the offenders are red avatars.  Guys actually read the articles and if you don't understand them please ask someone to explain them instead of just going into infantile hysterics.  This stuff is serious and irrational fear mongering is what allowed the HIV epidemic to get out of control in the US in the first place.

Yes, I think that someone who lies about having AIDS and then proceeds to have sex with that person is sickening.

The article didn't say anything about anyone having AIDS.  Maybe you were thinking of a different article?

Okay HIV.

Yes, I think that someone who lies about having HIV or AIDS and then proceeds to have sex with that person is sickening.


Now lets hear you defend your high-risk, HIV infected, lying, sex-addict now.

[Jordan]

And more deflection.

[Jordan]

So according to you, it is okay for someone with HIV or STDs to lie about having it, then have protected or unprotected sex with the person or persons that he or she duped, and if that person or other people doesn't get infected, then no crime was committed?

[Jordan]

It's not that he has HIV or STDs that concerns me.

What concerns me is that the person is lying about it and therefore the unsuspecting partners can't make an informed decision regarding risk.

If someone who is HIV positive wants to have unprotected (or protected) sex with someone who doesn't have HIV, I'm all for it, but the other person should be informed of the other person's status.  Therefore the person can make an informed decision.

Does the risk of contracting HIV or STDs outweigh the joy of having sex with this person?

Each person can then answer this for his or herself and make an informed decision.


I won't have sex with anyone who is HIV+.

It is nothing personal.  It is just a risk I don't want to take.

[Jordan]

Yes, I think that someone who lies about having HIV or AIDS and then proceeds to have sex with that person is sickening.

Now lets hear you defend your high-risk, HIV infected, lying, sex-addict now.

I could point out that he may be less bigoted than you.

I never realized that the lying bug infected defenders voting block had so many members.