NY-20 Special Election (user search)
       |           

Welcome, Guest. Please login or register.
Did you miss your activation email?
May 15, 2024, 04:14:29 AM
News: Election Simulator 2.0 Released. Senate/Gubernatorial maps, proportional electoral votes, and more - Read more

  Talk Elections
  Other Elections - Analysis and Discussion
  Congressional Elections (Moderators: Brittain33, GeorgiaModerate, Gass3268, Virginiá, Gracile)
  NY-20 Special Election (search mode)
Pages: [1] 2
Author Topic: NY-20 Special Election  (Read 179618 times)
Alcon
Atlas Superstar
*****
Posts: 30,866
United States


« on: March 31, 2009, 08:35:28 PM »

Tedisco 34,730 (51.0%)
Murphy 33,360 (49.0%)

Lame and useless: Columbia, Delaware, Dutchess, Otsego.  Got a link on any, cinyc?
Logged
Alcon
Atlas Superstar
*****
Posts: 30,866
United States


« Reply #1 on: March 31, 2009, 08:37:46 PM »

Could someone link to the site with Columbia, Delaware, Dutchess and Otsego?  Can't find it for my life, but I have an automated update program hooked up for the others.
Logged
Alcon
Atlas Superstar
*****
Posts: 30,866
United States


« Reply #2 on: March 31, 2009, 08:40:12 PM »

Excluding CDDO:

Tedisco 39,543 (51.0%)
Murphy 37,929 (49.0%)

Tedisco is crashing a bit in Saratoga, but improving in the smaller counties.
Logged
Alcon
Atlas Superstar
*****
Posts: 30,866
United States


« Reply #3 on: March 31, 2009, 08:41:52 PM »

Updated with cinyc's numbers from CDDO:

Tedisco 46,694 (50.6%)
Murphy 45,598 (49.4%)
Logged
Alcon
Atlas Superstar
*****
Posts: 30,866
United States


« Reply #4 on: March 31, 2009, 08:43:54 PM »

This number includes Delaware and the latest from all counties.

Tedisco 53,493 (50.4%)
Murphy 52,548 (49.6%)
Logged
Alcon
Atlas Superstar
*****
Posts: 30,866
United States


« Reply #5 on: March 31, 2009, 08:47:12 PM »

Tedisco 56,079 (50.5%)
Murphy 55,039 (49.4%)
Logged
Alcon
Atlas Superstar
*****
Posts: 30,866
United States


« Reply #6 on: March 31, 2009, 08:48:45 PM »

Murphy is running out of counties where he's leading.

Tedisco 59,252 (50.5%)
Murphy 58,133 (49.5%)
Logged
Alcon
Atlas Superstar
*****
Posts: 30,866
United States


« Reply #7 on: March 31, 2009, 08:50:34 PM »

Tedisco 61,858 (50.5%)
Murphy 60,663 (49.5%)
Logged
Alcon
Atlas Superstar
*****
Posts: 30,866
United States


« Reply #8 on: March 31, 2009, 08:55:49 PM »
« Edited: March 31, 2009, 08:58:22 PM by Alcon »

Reporting seems to have grinded to a hault, which means here on out, it's mostly precincts were the ballot reconciliation did not match.  And Columbia, which obviously is being slow.  It will be a long night, and longer than just night, but it's hard to see Murphy pulling it off.  I like 1,000 or so.

Edit: Spoke too soon.

Tedisco 64,143 (50.4%)
Murphy 63,063 (49.6%)

Edit: And again, Saratoga.

Tedisco 67,755 (50.6%)
Murphy 66,428 (49.4%)
Logged
Alcon
Atlas Superstar
*****
Posts: 30,866
United States


« Reply #9 on: March 31, 2009, 09:02:06 PM »

I have 68,394 to 66,891 (+1497).
Logged
Alcon
Atlas Superstar
*****
Posts: 30,866
United States


« Reply #10 on: March 31, 2009, 09:03:58 PM »

A Murphy >70 precinct just came in.  Looks like there's some chance that the remaining Saratoga precincts trend Springs.  Hard to imagine it will be enough.

Tedisco 68,641 (50.5%)
Murphy 67,322 (49.5%)

Tedisco +1,319
Logged
Alcon
Atlas Superstar
*****
Posts: 30,866
United States


« Reply #11 on: March 31, 2009, 09:06:35 PM »

Later Saratoga precincts seem to be disproportionally Democratic.  This could tighten.

Tedisco 69,369 (50.5%)
Murphy 68,122 (49.5%)

Margin: Tedisco +1,247
Logged
Alcon
Atlas Superstar
*****
Posts: 30,866
United States


« Reply #12 on: March 31, 2009, 09:11:45 PM »

Damn.

Tedisco 74,413 (50.1%)
Murphy 74,183 (49.9%)
Logged
Alcon
Atlas Superstar
*****
Posts: 30,866
United States


« Reply #13 on: March 31, 2009, 09:12:46 PM »

28 votes

Tedisco 75,692 (50.0%)
Murphy 75,664 (50.0%)

3 left in Saratoga, 8 in Columbia
Logged
Alcon
Atlas Superstar
*****
Posts: 30,866
United States


« Reply #14 on: March 31, 2009, 09:16:56 PM »

Columbia in.

Murphy 76,825 (50.1%)
Tedisco 76,541 (49.9%)

Murphy +284
Logged
Alcon
Atlas Superstar
*****
Posts: 30,866
United States


« Reply #15 on: March 31, 2009, 09:18:19 PM »

Tightened.

One precinct outstanding in Saratoga, and that's it.

Murphy 77,208 (50.0%)
Tedisco 77,127 (50.0%)

Murphy +81
Logged
Alcon
Atlas Superstar
*****
Posts: 30,866
United States


« Reply #16 on: March 31, 2009, 09:19:55 PM »

All but 1 Saratoga precinct in now:
Tedesco 76,278 (50.08%)
Murphy  76,047 (49.92%)

Your Washington is out-of-date, I think.  Pretty sure it's Murphy +81.
Logged
Alcon
Atlas Superstar
*****
Posts: 30,866
United States


« Reply #17 on: March 31, 2009, 09:22:09 PM »

My calculations have it at 76,956 - 76,907 for Murphy, using the AP totals and calculating the difference between their results for Saratoga and the county results (which are all in).


They are behind in Washington.  I'm 99.9% sure it's 77,208-77,127 Murphy.
Logged
Alcon
Atlas Superstar
*****
Posts: 30,866
United States


« Reply #18 on: March 31, 2009, 09:25:23 PM »

While we're at it:  This is a great example of why press turnout stories always suck.
Logged
Alcon
Atlas Superstar
*****
Posts: 30,866
United States


« Reply #19 on: March 31, 2009, 09:26:20 PM »

So there is still one precinct remaining, right?

Yep.  Very possible it may flip the race back over.
Logged
Alcon
Atlas Superstar
*****
Posts: 30,866
United States


« Reply #20 on: March 31, 2009, 09:30:39 PM »

Maybe one includes provisional ballots and the other doesn't.
Logged
Alcon
Atlas Superstar
*****
Posts: 30,866
United States


« Reply #21 on: March 31, 2009, 10:49:42 PM »

Provisionals, too.  I imagine that provisionals will essentially cancel out military absentees, and we'll be left at square one.
Logged
Alcon
Atlas Superstar
*****
Posts: 30,866
United States


« Reply #22 on: April 01, 2009, 03:02:37 PM »

Affidavit (provisional) ballots, too, folks!  I have no idea why the media is totally ignoring them.
Logged
Alcon
Atlas Superstar
*****
Posts: 30,866
United States


« Reply #23 on: April 15, 2009, 03:11:51 PM »


He's technically right.  It's a direct vote, albeit one on republican representatives, but it's still "democratic" in the stringent sense.

With Rowan on this one.  If there were a pattern emerging that would be sufficient to overturn this margin, we would have seen it by now.  Nothing's impossible, but within a rational explanation for why a last-minute veer will happen, it's safe to assume it won't.
Logged
Alcon
Atlas Superstar
*****
Posts: 30,866
United States


« Reply #24 on: April 15, 2009, 07:30:16 PM »

We've seen a last-minute veer in this race before, those final precincts coming in far more strongly for Murphy than we had expected.

That's different though.  You can have a few polling places outstanding, with multiple precincts each.  And ballots aren't "clustered" like that in this scenario.  And... Tongue
Logged
Pages: [1] 2  
Jump to:  


Login with username, password and session length

Terms of Service - DMCA Agent and Policy - Privacy Policy and Cookies

Powered by SMF 1.1.21 | SMF © 2015, Simple Machines

Page created in 0.051 seconds with 11 queries.