Is it inherently wrong to believe something for which there is no evidence? (user search)
       |           

Welcome, Guest. Please login or register.
Did you miss your activation email?
May 03, 2024, 02:27:17 PM
News: Election Simulator 2.0 Released. Senate/Gubernatorial maps, proportional electoral votes, and more - Read more

  Talk Elections
  General Discussion
  Religion & Philosophy (Moderator: Okay, maybe Mike Johnson is a competent parliamentarian.)
  Is it inherently wrong to believe something for which there is no evidence? (search mode)
Pages: [1]
Poll
Question: ^
#1
YES, believing things without sufficient evidence is an inherently bad thing		  
#2
NO, believing things without sufficient evidence is neither inherently good nor inherently bad		  
#3
NO, believing things without sufficient evidence is inherently good		  
Show Pie Chart
Partisan results
Total Voters: 45

Author Topic: Is it inherently wrong to believe something for which there is no evidence?  (Read 953 times)
7,052,770
Harry
Atlas Superstar
*****
Posts: 35,448
Ukraine


« on: April 03, 2021, 12:21:07 PM »
I don't think I would go that far in rhetoric, but generally speaking I think it's better to base your beliefs on evidence instead of feelings, traditions, or what someone else told you.
Logged
Pages: [1]  
Jump to:  


Login with username, password and session length

Terms of Service - DMCA Agent and Policy - Privacy Policy and Cookies

Powered by SMF 1.1.21 | SMF © 2015, Simple Machines

Page created in 0.024 seconds with 13 queries.