Why was Dukakis so weak in the South? (user search)
       |           

Welcome, Guest. Please login or register.
May 20, 2024, 08:33:40 AM
News: Election Simulator 2.0 Released. Senate/Gubernatorial maps, proportional electoral votes, and more - Read more

  Talk Elections
  Presidential Elections - Analysis and Discussion
  U.S. Presidential Election Results (Moderator: Dereich)
  Why was Dukakis so weak in the South? (search mode)
Pages: [1]
Author Topic: Why was Dukakis so weak in the South?  (Read 928 times)
President Johnson
Atlas Star
*****
Posts: 29,137
Germany


Political Matrix
E: -3.23, S: -4.70


« on: February 05, 2019, 03:09:34 PM »

I know the South already drifted away from the Democrats by 1988, but they still had a significant base of power in this part of the United States. Despite, Dukakis was extremly weak in South. In most states of the former confederacy, he got totally blown out by double digits (in some cases 20 points; states that were later won by Clinton). Only Missouri in the upper South was somewhat close. Why did Dukakis so poorly here or why was Poppy Bush so strong?

Bill Clinton by comparison did much better, but made it such a difference he was a Southerner himself? If so, this effect somewhat faded away quickly after his reelection 1996 because because Al Gore didn't benefit much from his heritage (though he did better in the South than Kerry in 2004). Lloyd Bentsen also didn't really help Dukakis in the South the way LBJ did for JFK.
Logged
Pages: [1]  
Jump to:  


Login with username, password and session length

Terms of Service - DMCA Agent and Policy - Privacy Policy and Cookies

Powered by SMF 1.1.21 | SMF © 2015, Simple Machines

Page created in 0.017 seconds with 11 queries.