NRA starts running ads for Trump - go Benghazi, not guns (user search)
       |           

Welcome, Guest. Please login or register.
Did you miss your activation email?
May 21, 2024, 12:13:12 PM
News: Election Simulator 2.0 Released. Senate/Gubernatorial maps, proportional electoral votes, and more - Read more

  Talk Elections
  Election Archive
  Election Archive
  2016 U.S. Presidential Election
  NRA starts running ads for Trump - go Benghazi, not guns (search mode)
Pages: [1]
Author Topic: NRA starts running ads for Trump - go Benghazi, not guns  (Read 1435 times)
Wells
MikeWells12
YaBB God
*****
Posts: 4,075
United States


« on: June 30, 2016, 04:01:54 PM »

Very corny: the shots, the scripted lines, all of it. Also, who is Mark Geist? I'm guessing he's someone who's famous in conservative circle-jerks over Benghazi? Nobody who isn't in those circles is going to be aware of him or care about what he says...or care about this non-issue, for that matter.

The people that the ad targets (Never Trump Republicans) will care.

A Venn diagram showing #NeverTrump Republicans and Benghazi enthusiasts would look very much like a hand-drawn illustration of some very full breasts.

Only a total left wing hack would use the term "Benghazi enthusiasts".


Why? What's wrong with using the phrase "Benghazi enthusiasts"? Does it not aptly describe those who are enthused by Benghazi?
Logged
Wells
MikeWells12
YaBB God
*****
Posts: 4,075
United States


« Reply #1 on: June 30, 2016, 04:15:46 PM »

Very corny: the shots, the scripted lines, all of it. Also, who is Mark Geist? I'm guessing he's someone who's famous in conservative circle-jerks over Benghazi? Nobody who isn't in those circles is going to be aware of him or care about what he says...or care about this non-issue, for that matter.

The people that the ad targets (Never Trump Republicans) will care.

A Venn diagram showing #NeverTrump Republicans and Benghazi enthusiasts would look very much like a hand-drawn illustration of some very full breasts.

Only a total left wing hack would use the term "Benghazi enthusiasts".


Why? What's wrong with using the phrase "Benghazi enthusiasts"? Does it not aptly describe those who are enthused by Benghazi?

"Benghazi enthusiasts" exist only in the idle chatter of the extreme left.

How would you describe people who care about Benghazi?
Logged
Wells
MikeWells12
YaBB God
*****
Posts: 4,075
United States


« Reply #2 on: June 30, 2016, 04:36:09 PM »

Very corny: the shots, the scripted lines, all of it. Also, who is Mark Geist? I'm guessing he's someone who's famous in conservative circle-jerks over Benghazi? Nobody who isn't in those circles is going to be aware of him or care about what he says...or care about this non-issue, for that matter.

The people that the ad targets (Never Trump Republicans) will care.

A Venn diagram showing #NeverTrump Republicans and Benghazi enthusiasts would look very much like a hand-drawn illustration of some very full breasts.

Only a total left wing hack would use the term "Benghazi enthusiasts".


Why? What's wrong with using the phrase "Benghazi enthusiasts"? Does it not aptly describe those who are enthused by Benghazi?

"Benghazi enthusiasts" exist only in the idle chatter of the extreme left.

How would you describe people who care about Benghazi?

Patriots

What if I told you that there were fewer embassy attacks under Clinton than her predecessor as Sectretary of State?
Logged
Wells
MikeWells12
YaBB God
*****
Posts: 4,075
United States


« Reply #3 on: June 30, 2016, 04:55:40 PM »

What if I told you that there were fewer embassy attacks under Clinton than her predecessor as Secretary of State?

None was this vicious. And it was all her making. Her policies helped create two failed states. Three, if we also count her senatorial career and Iraq.


There were only four deaths in thirteen hours in this ultra-vicious attack. Apparently, this is Clinton's fault. On September 17, 2008, in Yemen, there were 16 deaths at the embassy in 20 minutes. Is that Condoleeza Rice's fault? Or maybe Benghazi is just a politically motivated witch-hunt. But I guess if it brings down Clinton's poll numbers. . .

As for Clinton, she has exhibited less than stellar judgement in the past. Her foreign policy is too hawkish in my opinion. I will acknowledge this weakness (though she has learned from her mistakes (I doubt she will start empire building once she is president)). However, I trust Trump's judgement less. He is dangerous and nowhere will be safe if he gets his tiny fingers in the same room as the nuclear launch codes. Seriously, he's terrible. He doesn't know a thing about foreign policy.
Oh, wait, I forgot, he can make deals. And he was on 60 Minutes with Putin once.
Logged
Pages: [1]  
Jump to:  


Login with username, password and session length

Terms of Service - DMCA Agent and Policy - Privacy Policy and Cookies

Powered by SMF 1.1.21 | SMF © 2015, Simple Machines

Page created in 0.034 seconds with 12 queries.