Very seldom did I ever hear anything about the practical problems of Obama legislation.
Take the health program (which I support given no alternative...but it's still irresponsible.) The only thing the European press bothers to tell people is that it gives so and so many million people insurance. Nothing about structural flaws. Nothing about it's complete lack of cost control. And so on.
I've never seen any reporting about what real problems Obama's legislation has...the press is just like a fan group, cheering for anything they can get.
I don't know what press you were reading; the 'structural flaws' were discussed on the BBC, in the Telegraph, Guardian etc which I followed closely. They were reasoned discussions too. The impact of his presidency has also been explored in many media outlets and not always favourably; (
http://www.telegraph.co.uk/news/newstopics/crossingamerica/) Your recent sweeping comments on this page seem to be uncharacteristic of you.
On a wider note Franzl, remember that universal health care or at least accessable health insurance has been an ingrained part of western society in most nations since the war; to such an extent that it creates a broad political concensus across left and right in most countries. I would not therefore have expected the press or the wider public in Europe to take Obama to task for trying to introduce what most people in Europe would agree is a 'better' system than the one it replaced.