Should Taxpayers ever fund large stadia/arenas? (user search)
       |           

Welcome, Guest. Please login or register.
Did you miss your activation email?
May 04, 2024, 06:34:29 PM
News: Election Simulator 2.0 Released. Senate/Gubernatorial maps, proportional electoral votes, and more - Read more

  Talk Elections
  General Politics
  Political Debate (Moderator: Torie)
  Should Taxpayers ever fund large stadia/arenas? (search mode)
Pages: [1]
Poll
Question: Title
#1
Yes
 
#2
No
 
Show Pie Chart
Partisan results

Total Voters: 35

Author Topic: Should Taxpayers ever fund large stadia/arenas?  (Read 1331 times)
Since I'm the mad scientist proclaimed by myself
omegascarlet
Junior Chimp
*****
Posts: 7,061


« on: July 24, 2022, 11:31:12 PM »

As I recall, I get a +2 happiness per stadium in Civ V, so seems like a good move.
even if that transferred to real life, it still wouldn't be worth it (and it wouldn't be worth it in game if it only gives you a couple of happiness....though I suppose I haven't played Civ 5 much in years and don't really remember how hard it was to keep people happy....wait...didn't that one have that weird civ wide happiness deal and not per city like all the other Civ games? ugggg, bad game  Civ 4 with mods is still the best Civ experience)

Yup, Civ V has civilization-wide happiness. It's what I've played most, so I don't really know any other system. But point being, if happiness gets too low, rebels pop up and productivity stalls, so, yes, happiness is important. Re Civ IV: Might have to pick it up at some point.
Civ 4 is great, its simultaneously much deeper and more fast paced than V.
Logged
Pages: [1]  
Jump to:  


Login with username, password and session length

Terms of Service - DMCA Agent and Policy - Privacy Policy and Cookies

Powered by SMF 1.1.21 | SMF © 2015, Simple Machines

Page created in 0.023 seconds with 13 queries.