If you were appointed the drawer all the congressional districts for 2022... (user search)
       |           

Welcome, Guest. Please login or register.
Did you miss your activation email?
May 14, 2024, 01:23:29 PM
News: Election Simulator 2.0 Released. Senate/Gubernatorial maps, proportional electoral votes, and more - Read more

  Talk Elections
  Other Elections - Analysis and Discussion
  Congressional Elections (Moderators: Brittain33, GeorgiaModerate, Gass3268, Virginiá, Gracile)
  If you were appointed the drawer all the congressional districts for 2022... (search mode)
Pages: [1]
Poll
Question: ...how would you do it?
#1
Republican gerrymander, even more so than the current one
 
#2
Slight Republican gerrymander, but not going too far
 
#3
Deliberately drawing swing districts all over the country to elect centrist Congress
 
#4
Strict ban on gerrymandering, just drawing without any racial or partisan information
 
#5
Marginal Democratic gerrymander, but not to an extreme
 
#6
Complete Democratic gerrymander, getting rid of GOP in Cali, NY, and IL
 
Show Pie Chart
Partisan results

Total Voters: 88

Calculate results by number of options selected
Author Topic: If you were appointed the drawer all the congressional districts for 2022...  (Read 4582 times)
Blackacre
Spenstar3D
Sr. Member
****
Posts: 2,172
United States


Political Matrix
E: -5.35, S: -7.22

« on: February 13, 2017, 12:44:09 PM »

The sane, normal side of me prefers option 3: a congress that's as responsive to the people as possible.

However, I must admit, there is a craven, almost McConnelist part of me that would revel at option 6.
Logged
Blackacre
Spenstar3D
Sr. Member
****
Posts: 2,172
United States


Political Matrix
E: -5.35, S: -7.22

« Reply #1 on: February 13, 2017, 01:36:05 PM »

The sane, normal side of me prefers option 3: a congress that's as responsive to the people as possible.

However, I must admit, there is a craven, almost McConnelist part of me that would revel at option 6.
This, but I wouldn't be too upset about option 4 either.

Option 3 is just as bad as options 1 and 6, if you need proof that Moderate Hero hacks/Centrist Smiley ideologues are both real and can have some pretty awful views, look no further than smoltchanov.

Option 3 isn't about a centrist congress, it's about an elastic one. It creates a level playing field. I couldn't care less about moderate hacks and I'm sure as heck not a moderate myself
Logged
Blackacre
Spenstar3D
Sr. Member
****
Posts: 2,172
United States


Political Matrix
E: -5.35, S: -7.22

« Reply #2 on: February 14, 2017, 09:35:10 AM »

S I N G L E

T R A N S F E R A B L E

V O T E

^^^^^^^
This really is the best option. Preferably with districts that ignore state boundaries (at least on the continental US) and a roughly proportional Senate that also follows STV rules and gives DC a single Senator.
Logged
Pages: [1]  
Jump to:  


Login with username, password and session length

Terms of Service - DMCA Agent and Policy - Privacy Policy and Cookies

Powered by SMF 1.1.21 | SMF © 2015, Simple Machines

Page created in 0.031 seconds with 13 queries.