Canadian Redistribution - Federal, Provincial, Municipal
       |           

Welcome, Guest. Please login or register.
Did you miss your activation email?
May 03, 2024, 01:43:23 PM
News: Election Simulator 2.0 Released. Senate/Gubernatorial maps, proportional electoral votes, and more - Read more

  Talk Elections
  Other Elections - Analysis and Discussion
  International Elections (Moderators: afleitch, Hash)
  Canadian Redistribution - Federal, Provincial, Municipal
« previous next »
Pages: 1 ... 3 4 5 6 7 [8] 9 10 11 12 13 14
Author Topic: Canadian Redistribution - Federal, Provincial, Municipal  (Read 44121 times)
Hatman 🍁
EarlAW
Atlas Star
*****
Posts: 26,002
Canada


WWW Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #175 on: August 16, 2018, 09:17:28 AM »

I PMed you my commentary (and is now lost in cyberspace). But overall, a very good map except for Conestoga-Brant.
Logged
Krago
Jr. Member
***
Posts: 1,084
Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #176 on: August 16, 2018, 10:28:49 AM »

Conestoga-Preston-Hespeler and Galt-Brant?

By the way, having that maple leaf in your name makes it difficult to PM you.  You don't appear on any searches of member's names.  Or maybe that was the point?
Logged
Hatman 🍁
EarlAW
Atlas Star
*****
Posts: 26,002
Canada


WWW Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #177 on: August 16, 2018, 10:46:27 AM »

Conestoga-Preston-Hespeler and Galt-Brant?

By the way, having that maple leaf in your name makes it difficult to PM you.  You don't appear on any searches of member's names.  Or maybe that was the point?

Unintended consequence. I'll move the maple leaf to after my display name. But searching my original display name, "EarlAW" should work, shouldn't it?
Logged
Hatman 🍁
EarlAW
Atlas Star
*****
Posts: 26,002
Canada


WWW Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #178 on: August 16, 2018, 10:48:24 AM »

Conestoga-Preston-Hespeler and Galt-Brant?


This works. Cambridge needs to be split up anyways, as it's too big to be one riding. Might as well split it down the middle, Barrie-style.
Logged
DC Al Fine
Atlas Icon
*****
Posts: 14,080
Canada


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #179 on: August 16, 2018, 10:48:37 AM »

Have you done an Alberta map. Five new seats would be interesting. Also, you should do an NS one because I said so Smiley
Logged
adma
Sr. Member
****
Posts: 2,744
Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #180 on: August 16, 2018, 09:02:30 PM »

This works. Cambridge needs to be split up anyways, as it's too big to be one riding. Might as well split it down the middle, Barrie-style.

Isn't it already split with Hespeler off on its own?  At this point, just getting rid of North Dumfries might do the trick (though "Galt-Preston" feels a little too anachronistic as a riding name)
Logged
Hatman 🍁
EarlAW
Atlas Star
*****
Posts: 26,002
Canada


WWW Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #181 on: August 16, 2018, 09:21:08 PM »

I'm all for anachronistic riding names.
Logged
Krago
Jr. Member
***
Posts: 1,084
Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #182 on: August 16, 2018, 10:38:41 PM »

And having a riding named after John Galt would make the Libertarians happy.

Anyway, I've updated my map with changes in Wellington, Halton and Peel.  But Conestoga-Brant stays put.

https://goo.gl/6UMkjz

Logged
Hatman 🍁
EarlAW
Atlas Star
*****
Posts: 26,002
Canada


WWW Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #183 on: August 17, 2018, 09:56:02 AM »

And having a riding named after John Galt would make the Libertarians happy.

Anyway, I've updated my map with changes in Wellington, Halton and Peel.  But Conestoga-Brant stays put.

https://goo.gl/6UMkjz



Angry

At least the Brampton-Caledon riding makes more sense. Smiley
Logged
Krago
Jr. Member
***
Posts: 1,084
Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #184 on: August 17, 2018, 10:27:51 AM »

Oh my god, they killed Conestoga--Brant! You bastards!

Please check my new improved map (same URL).
Logged
Hatman 🍁
EarlAW
Atlas Star
*****
Posts: 26,002
Canada


WWW Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #185 on: August 17, 2018, 12:49:33 PM »

Much better. It's a very natural split for Cambridge.
Logged
Krago
Jr. Member
***
Posts: 1,084
Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #186 on: August 17, 2018, 10:14:14 PM »

Have you done an Alberta map. Five new seats would be interesting. Also, you should do an NS one because I said so Smiley

Any preliminary thoughts on Pictou-Preston and Sackville-Bedford?
Logged
DC Al Fine
Atlas Icon
*****
Posts: 14,080
Canada


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #187 on: August 18, 2018, 07:06:31 AM »

Have you done an Alberta map. Five new seats would be interesting. Also, you should do an NS one because I said so Smiley

Any preliminary thoughts on Pictou-Preston and Sackville-Bedford?

Sackville-Bedford makes sense and would make for an interesting district (working class suburb next to a UMC one). No one really lives in between Pictou and Preston though. It's a bit odd.
Logged
Njall
Jr. Member
***
Posts: 1,021
Canada


Political Matrix
E: -1.55, S: -5.91

Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #188 on: August 21, 2018, 11:55:19 AM »

Have you done an Alberta map. Five new seats would be interesting. Also, you should do an NS one because I said so Smiley

I second the motion in favour of an Alberta map Cheesy
Logged
toaster
Jr. Member
***
Posts: 356
Canada


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #189 on: August 23, 2018, 08:39:43 PM »
« Edited: August 23, 2018, 09:04:41 PM by toaster »

I got ahold of some 2021 population projections, so I decided to do what I do best.

Using the provincial figures, Alberta would add five seats in the House of Commons and Ontario would gain one.  All other provinces would remain the same, including BC.

Here’s what an Ontario map of 122 Federal ridings (9 North, 113 South) could look like.

https://goo.gl/6UMkjz

I don't think ridings of 130k+ are going to fly (when you have ridings of 110k in the same city) particularly in Toronto, when it means residents in those ridings will now be losing out on voter parity at 3 levels because the boundaries will all align. Also, crossing Steeles will be a problem.
Logged
Krago
Jr. Member
***
Posts: 1,084
Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #190 on: August 26, 2018, 09:48:07 AM »

Anyway, I've updated my map with 32 proposed federal ridings in Atlantic Canada.

Bonavista--Burin--Avalon!  Truro--Cole Harbour!  Saint John West--Charlotte!

https://goo.gl/6UMkjz
Logged
Krago
Jr. Member
***
Posts: 1,084
Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #191 on: August 27, 2018, 02:19:33 PM »

Anyway, I've updated my map with 32 proposed federal ridings in Atlantic Canada.

Bonavista--Burin--Avalon!  Truro--Cole Harbour!  Saint John West--Charlotte!

https://goo.gl/6UMkjz

Now with 28 proposed ridings in Manitoba and Saskatchewan.

Saskatoon North--Warman!  Regina South!  Others!
Logged
Krago
Jr. Member
***
Posts: 1,084
Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #192 on: August 29, 2018, 06:00:14 PM »

Still working on Alberta, but here are where the five 'new' seats would go:
  • Airdrie-Chestermere
  • Calgary East
  • Calgary North
  • St. Albert-Edmonton would split into St. Albert and Edmonton Northwest
  • Edmonton-Wetaskiwin would split into Leduc-Wetaskiwin and Edmonton South

Overall, the ridings would be allocated:

- Calgary 12 (entirely within city limits) - avg 121,000
- Edmonton 9 (entirely within city limits) - avg 121,000
- Miscellaneous 18 - avg 117,000
Logged
Njall
Jr. Member
***
Posts: 1,021
Canada


Political Matrix
E: -1.55, S: -5.91

Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #193 on: August 30, 2018, 02:13:31 AM »

Still working on Alberta, but here are where the five 'new' seats would go:
  • Airdrie-Chestermere
  • Calgary East
  • Calgary North
  • St. Albert-Edmonton would split into St. Albert and Edmonton Northwest
  • Edmonton-Wetaskiwin would split into Leduc-Wetaskiwin and Edmonton South

Overall, the ridings would be allocated:

- Calgary 12 (entirely within city limits) - avg 121,000
- Edmonton 9 (entirely within city limits) - avg 121,000
- Miscellaneous 18 - avg 117,000

I'm excited to see this.
Logged
Krago
Jr. Member
***
Posts: 1,084
Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #194 on: August 30, 2018, 06:12:38 PM »

Alberta is now up.   https://goo.gl/6UMkjz

A few points:

- Every riding is within 5% of the provincial average.  Suck it Ontario!

- Yeah, I know about Vegreville.  Stuff happens.  I guess Battle River-Crowfoot's recruitment slogan ("Come live where the lead singer of Nickelback grew up!") hasn't taken off.  Yet.

- For the most part, the new riding names are rather boring (Edmonton Northwest, Edmonton South, Calgary North, Airdrie-Chestermere).  However, I chose Woodlands instead of Whitecourt (after Westlock's removal from the seat), since the revised Peace River riding does have a lot of trees.  Since Griesbach is no longer in the riding, I came up with Edmonton Commonwealth as a counterpoint to Calgary Confederation.  Finally, I waffled between resurrecting "Rocky Mountain" or "Wild Rose" for the Banff-Cochrane-Sundre-Rocky Mountain House riding.
Logged
Tintrlvr
Junior Chimp
*****
Posts: 5,317


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #195 on: August 30, 2018, 06:55:35 PM »

Alberta is now up.   https://goo.gl/6UMkjz

A few points:

- Every riding is within 5% of the provincial average.  Suck it Ontario!

- Yeah, I know about Vegreville.  Stuff happens.  I guess Battle River-Crowfoot's recruitment slogan ("Come live where the lead singer of Nickelback grew up!") hasn't taken off.  Yet.

- For the most part, the new riding names are rather boring (Edmonton Northwest, Edmonton South, Calgary North, Airdrie-Chestermere).  However, I chose Woodlands instead of Whitecourt (after Westlock's removal from the seat), since the revised Peace River riding does have a lot of trees.  Since Griesbach is no longer in the riding, I came up with Edmonton Commonwealth as a counterpoint to Calgary Confederation.  Finally, I waffled between resurrecting "Rocky Mountain" or "Wild Rose" for the Banff-Cochrane-Sundre-Rocky Mountain House riding.

Is there any reasonable way to put Red Deer into a single district and draw the other district around it? Seems like the rest of the map follows the philosophy of not drawing rurban seats.
Logged
Krago
Jr. Member
***
Posts: 1,084
Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #196 on: August 30, 2018, 07:56:20 PM »

Red Deer has approx. 113,000 people while the rest of Lacombe-Mountain View has 123,000.  Just find 5,000 people hiding in the Red Deer suburbs and you have yourself a Viable Electoral District.
Logged
Njall
Jr. Member
***
Posts: 1,021
Canada


Political Matrix
E: -1.55, S: -5.91

Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #197 on: August 31, 2018, 02:02:54 PM »

Red Deer has approx. 113,000 people while the rest of Lacombe-Mountain View has 123,000.  Just find 5,000 people hiding in the Red Deer suburbs and you have yourself a Viable Electoral District.

I don't know if this would quite get you to 5,000, but the hamlet of Springbrook (adjacent to the Red Deer Regional Airport) is very Red Deer-centric. I believe that most working folks there commute into Red Deer (or Gasoline Alley), and Red Deer Transit actually runs peak-hour bus service to Springbrook.

I'll likely have a bit more feedback for the rest of the map later, but overall I actually really like this.
Logged
DC Al Fine
Atlas Icon
*****
Posts: 14,080
Canada


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #198 on: August 31, 2018, 03:05:08 PM »

Anyway, I've updated my map with 32 proposed federal ridings in Atlantic Canada.

Bonavista--Burin--Avalon!  Truro--Cole Harbour!  Saint John West--Charlotte!

https://goo.gl/6UMkjz

Got a chance to look at Nova Scotia. A few points:

1) There's a near 20k difference between Sackvile and Halifax. That might fly if the difference was between Halifax and a rural riding, but it won't if both ridings are in the city.
2) West Nova is good, but no one in Nova Scotia calls anything _____ Nova
3) I like how you did Northern NS/Cape Breton
4) Truro-Cole Harbour is awkward.
Logged
Krago
Jr. Member
***
Posts: 1,084
Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #199 on: August 31, 2018, 10:51:30 PM »
« Edited: August 31, 2018, 11:08:52 PM by Krago »

(1) Sackville/Halifax is now balanced.

(2) Red Deer is now reunified.

(3) Edmonton-Mill Woods is now 20% more Mill Woods-y.


Enjoy your Labour Day weekend.



Any opinions on Wild Rose vs. Rocky Mountain?
Logged
Pages: 1 ... 3 4 5 6 7 [8] 9 10 11 12 13 14  
« previous next »
Jump to:  


Login with username, password and session length

Terms of Service - DMCA Agent and Policy - Privacy Policy and Cookies

Powered by SMF 1.1.21 | SMF © 2015, Simple Machines

Page created in 0.041 seconds with 12 queries.