LOL Washington post. Hillary on the other hand is so authentic and charismatic.
Compared to Kasich, yes. Part of it is that she's an international celebrity and has been around since the 1990s. But, Clinton is a more polished politician than Kasich.
I get you're a big Hillary fan, but it's pretty absurd (or at least comically biased) to say so matter-of-factly that Hillary is more authentic than Kasich... That's not a flaw of his that would immediately be mentioned (while it's a frequent criticism of Hillary).
About 0.0 people think Kasich is a fake. He's authentic, at the very least.
Most people with eyes can see that Kasich and the rest of the Republican field is full of fakes and frauds. There's literally zero evidence that Kasich is a serious candidate.
What does that mean exactly? In what way are all of the Republicans fraudulent? How does one detect fraudulence with the eyes?
The last point is demonstrably false; I mean, a media rollout, website, and logo, are at least evidence, albeit not conclusive evidence, but obviously evidence, of a serious candidate.
