Gallup Tracking Poll Thread [Obama vs McCain]

[Thomas Jackson]

Brittain beat me to it.

[Thomas Jackson]

You must be logged in to read this quote.

No, StatesRights is exactly right. Those on the left vastly underestimate the absolute hatred that this election has generated for the media.

Many of us now regard the media as nothing more than political terrorists. They are vile scum, liars of the worst order.

There are consequences to everything. And the media has yet to see the consequences of their decision to become the "Pravda of Amerika."

The fallout from this will be massive.

[Thomas Jackson]

You must be logged in to read this quote.

I find it amazing that Obama supporters operate from narrow set of talking points, no matter where they post on the net.

The "stages of grief/dying" talking point is on almost every liberal political forum that I have visited. Can you people at least demonstrate some independent thought?

FYI: The "stages of grief/dying" talking point can only be correct if the election is important enough to grieve/die over.

Leftists who believe that government is their shepherd might believe that, but I know of no conservative who does. Conservatives realize that government only has as much power as the people voluntarily cede to them. As the 2nd Amendment is alive and well in this country, there is only so much that a leftist government could get away with.

I know that thought might devastate many on the left, but it is a categorical truth.

[Thomas Jackson]

You must be logged in to read this quote.

Fox objective reports both sides of a story. That's why the left hates them so much. They want one-sided Pravda coverage. Not objective reporting that allows the people to make a decision.

That's why Fox is hated by the left. They don't want the conservative side reported on anywhere.

Palin has more experience, and is more capable than Obama. The media knows this, so they run attack story after attack story, day in, day out.

For the most part they have left McCain alone. Everything has been targeted at Palin. Why? Because Palin represents what the elitists in the media hate the most. A down-to-earth Christian Conservative, who happens to be a woman.

The media hates her because of her faith. It's a secular jihad against Christians.

[Thomas Jackson]

You must be logged in to read this quote.

There is nothing wrong with Palin's interviews, other than the fact that she has been interviewed by partisan hacks (Couric and Gibson) who are willfully conducting the interviews in a "gotcha" manner.

Considering what she is up against, she has done a magnificent job.

The left would love to believe that Palin is a drooling idiot. Fact is, she is an accomplished executive, she is well-spoken, and she is the governor of the largest State in the country.

The filthy blowhards on internet boards and in the media are not capable of running a board meeting, let alone a city or State.

Thing is, deep down the scum know that they can't hold a candle to Palin. So they resort to trashing her.

[Thomas Jackson]

You must be logged in to read this quote.

I realize that you are attempting sarcasm, but it is likely that I DO visit liberal political forums more than you do. I like to read the talking points before they get repeated elsewhere.

And yes, the "stages of grief" narrative is plastered all over them.

What's more, it's not even a new narrative. Laughably, liberals had the EXACT same narrative going in 2004.

http://www.democraticunderground.com/discuss/duboard.php?az=view_all&address=104x2160846

I cannot believe that one would willingly retreat to the same tired talking points over and over, especially after that epic fail.

[Thomas Jackson]

You must be logged in to read this quote.

You must be logged in to read this quote.

See that little ignore button up there next to my name? Why don't you press it?

You guys were ganging up on StatesRights. I pointed out that he was right. Someone attacked him with the same "stages of grief" narrative that is plastered all over liberal internet boards. I pointed out that not only is this talking point all over the web, it isn't even new, and has been going on since at least 2004.

If you people don't want to hear the other side of the coin, why not use the ignore feature instead of playing the schoolyard gang-up game?

[Thomas Jackson]

You must be logged in to read this quote.

Wonderful, I invite others to take the same step.

At least you are consistent.

[Thomas Jackson]

So Sam, does this mean that there were two really good McCain samples, one really good McCain sample, or something else?