Which would be a better campaign slogan for a Democratic presidential candidate?

[I spent the winter writing songs about getting better]

Any candidate who uses either of these would instantly earn my vote, that's for sure.

[Torie]

They both suck.

[Mike Thick]

They both suck.

[Antonio the Sixth]

They both suck.

[Grand Wizard Lizard of the Klan]

They both suck.

[I spent the winter writing songs about getting better]

They both suck.

I thought at least you'd like them...

[Antonio the Sixth]

They both suck.

I thought at least you'd like them...

Uh, no? "Liberal" is an incredibly moronic term to describe the political left.

[This account no longer in use.]

They both suck.

And not just because of the word 'liberal'.

[FEMA Camp Administrator]

As much as I like to sh#t-talk humanity from time-to-time, we are way too dynamic a species for either of these to ever be possible. Liberalism as know it is, what, like one-hundred and fifty years old? Liberalism as a concept discussed in political discourse is like, uh, three hundred years old? Every ideology we pretend to have is contextually- and chronologically-based*. Do you believe that the values you happen to hold because of the specifics of your socialization process combined with genetics are the end all, be all of human thought? Or that even your general mental paradigm is all that we have left?

*Not to mention geographically as well! Would you be using this word in a different part of the world?

[Rockefeller GOP]

They both suck.

[Figueira]

Yeah, I agree that "liberal" is a terrible word for the left, even though I used to call myself one (and still do in certain circumstances). However, I kind of like "All liberal, all the time." It might be a good slogan for a candidate who is running in a country where "liberalism" is considered a good thing.

[Arturo Belano]

They both suck.

[DavidB.]

They both suck.

/thread

[Leinad]

Both are horrific, but "all liberalism, all the time" is, I suppose, slightly less horrific merely due to the fact that it's shorter (as in, there's less of it).

[Mr. Smith]

Both are horrific, but "all liberalism, all the time" is, I suppose, slightly less horrific merely due to the fact that it's shorter (as in, there's less of it).

And it doesn't ring back unintentionally to George Wallace.

[bagelman]

Both are horrific, but "all liberalism, all the time" is, I suppose, slightly less horrific merely due to the fact that it's shorter (as in, there's less of it).

And it doesn't ring back unintentionally to George Wallace.