Gay marriage map (user search)
       |           

Welcome, Guest. Please login or register.
Did you miss your activation email?
May 16, 2024, 08:47:21 AM
News: Election Simulator 2.0 Released. Senate/Gubernatorial maps, proportional electoral votes, and more - Read more

  Talk Elections
  General Politics
  U.S. General Discussion (Moderators: The Dowager Mod, Chancellor Tanterterg)
  Gay marriage map (search mode)
Pages: [1]
Author Topic: Gay marriage map  (Read 30700 times)
A18
Atlas Star
*****
Posts: 23,794
Political Matrix
E: 9.23, S: -6.35
« on: December 27, 2005, 04:45:57 PM »
I don't think there was a referendum.
Logged
A18
Atlas Star
*****
Posts: 23,794
Political Matrix
E: 9.23, S: -6.35
« Reply #1 on: December 27, 2005, 06:14:32 PM »
They do have the same rights. Each member of each has the right to marry someone of the opposite sex.

How about incestuous couples?
Logged
A18
Atlas Star
*****
Posts: 23,794
Political Matrix
E: 9.23, S: -6.35
« Reply #2 on: December 27, 2005, 07:43:49 PM »
Quote from: Frodo on December 27, 2005, 06:50:05 PM
Quote from: A18 on December 27, 2005, 04:45:57 PM
I don't think there was a referendum.

No, there wasn't -but then Jesus didn't specify whether he wanted us to give figures on those states that did, specifically, pass referendums banning gay marriage, or whether those gay marriage bans were passed by state legislatures. 

Either way, the gay marriage ban in Virginia probably passed solidly. 

I mean the people didn't vote on it, which is of course what he's using, given that it's a shaded map and such.
Logged
A18
Atlas Star
*****
Posts: 23,794
Political Matrix
E: 9.23, S: -6.35
« Reply #3 on: December 28, 2005, 11:25:34 AM »
Quote from: Pym Fortuyn on December 28, 2005, 02:12:17 AM
I don't want to change the entire concept of marriage, I just want to include same-sex couples. Polygamy and other forms would still be off limits. This debate is about including gays into the mainstream of society, and changing gov't involvement just avoids that question.

Why should gays be included, but not incestuous couples?

More importantly, why should government decide what should or should not be "mainstream?" You are apparently a fascist.
Logged
A18
Atlas Star
*****
Posts: 23,794
Political Matrix
E: 9.23, S: -6.35
« Reply #4 on: December 30, 2005, 11:15:25 AM »
Then I'm sorry your reasoning skills are so poor.
Logged
A18
Atlas Star
*****
Posts: 23,794
Political Matrix
E: 9.23, S: -6.35
« Reply #5 on: December 30, 2005, 04:59:57 PM »
They should. I was simply pointing out his hypocrisy.
Logged
A18
Atlas Star
*****
Posts: 23,794
Political Matrix
E: 9.23, S: -6.35
« Reply #6 on: December 30, 2005, 06:00:28 PM »

He refuses to endorse incestuous marriage, while whining about "equal rights" for homosexual couples.

Quote
You must be logged in to read this quote.

What are you talking about?
Logged
A18
Atlas Star
*****
Posts: 23,794
Political Matrix
E: 9.23, S: -6.35
« Reply #7 on: December 31, 2005, 07:05:28 PM »
Quote from: TakeOurCountryBack on December 31, 2005, 12:31:14 PM
Quote from: Jesus on December 30, 2005, 04:58:49 PM
And why shouldn't incestuous couples be allowed to get married?

really, really, screwed up kids.  no one should have to live with somehting like your parents being brother and sister

Why? Not all couples have kids anyway.
Logged
Pages: [1]  
Jump to:  


Login with username, password and session length

Terms of Service - DMCA Agent and Policy - Privacy Policy and Cookies

Powered by SMF 1.1.21 | SMF © 2015, Simple Machines

Page created in 0.03 seconds with 12 queries.