A totally "Open" Presidential Race in 2008 - First since 1952..?
       |           

Welcome, Guest. Please login or register.
Did you miss your activation email?
May 21, 2024, 02:59:08 AM
News: Election Simulator 2.0 Released. Senate/Gubernatorial maps, proportional electoral votes, and more - Read more

  Talk Elections
  Presidential Elections - Analysis and Discussion
  U.S. Presidential Election Results
  2004 U.S. Presidential Election Results (Moderator: Dereich)
  A totally "Open" Presidential Race in 2008 - First since 1952..?
« previous next »
Pages: [1]
Author Topic: A totally "Open" Presidential Race in 2008 - First since 1952..?  (Read 2469 times)
The Vorlon
Vorlon
YaBB God
*****
Posts: 4,660


Political Matrix
E: 8.00, S: -4.21

Show only this user's posts in this thread
« on: November 23, 2004, 01:46:26 AM »
« edited: November 23, 2004, 01:50:39 AM by The Vorlon »

2008 will be the first totally "Open" Presidential race since, by my count, 1952 where there was not a sitting President or VP running..

1956 - Ike was the incumbant - Status Quo Result
1960 - Nixon was the sitting VP - Change
1964 - Johnson was the Incumbant - Status Quo Result
1968 - Humphrey was the sitting VP  - Change
1972 - Nixon was the incumbant - Status Quo Result
1976 - Ford was the sort of Incumbant  - Change
1980 - Carter was the incumbant  - Change
1984 - Reagan was the Incumbant - Status Quo Result
1988 - Bush was the sitting VP - Status Quo Result
1992 - Bush was the Incumbant  - Change
1996 - Clinton was the Incumbant - Status Quo Result
2000 - Gore was the sitting VP  - Change
2004 - Bush was the Incumbant   - Status Quo Result

Status Quo won 7 times
Change won 6 Times

As the first race in a hald century without a "Status Quo" candidate it certainly opens up possibilities.

For example, at least in theory, both the Dem AND GOP candidates could both campaign as agents of change.

Should be an interesting race!
Logged
Erc
Junior Chimp
*****
Posts: 5,823
Slovenia


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #1 on: November 23, 2004, 02:05:58 AM »

Should prove to be the first interesting double-primary season since...1988?
Logged
Filuwaúrdjan
Realpolitik
Atlas Institution
*****
Posts: 67,814
United Kingdom


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #2 on: November 23, 2004, 05:49:16 AM »

Cool :-)

Now if only the state legislatures would see sense and un-gerrymander the Congressional Districts...
Logged
The Vorlon
Vorlon
YaBB God
*****
Posts: 4,660


Political Matrix
E: 8.00, S: -4.21

Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #3 on: November 23, 2004, 11:45:41 AM »

Cool :-)

Now if only the state legislatures would see sense and un-gerrymander the Congressional Districts...

The degree to which the Huse of Representatives is Gerrymandered is the truly astonishing political scandal that nobody reports (primarily because both parties are equally guilty)

Over 400+ out of the 435 seats have been made essentailly bomb proof and barring major scandal or a massive landslide are locked in.

Here is a list of EVERY House race in the entire nation decided by less than 10% (excludes 3 of those whacky run-offs from Louisiania)

House Races with a less than 10% gap

California 20 was decided by 8 points
Colorado 3 was decided by 3%,
Colorado 4 was decided by 6%
Connecticutt 4 was decided by 4%
Connecticutt 2 was decided by 8%
Georgia 12 was decided by 4%
Illinois 8 was decided by 4%
Indiania 2 was decided by 8%
Indiania 6 was decided by 9%
Indiania 9 was basically tied
Minnesota 6 was decided by 8%
Missouri 3 was decided by 8%
New York 27 was decided by 2%
Oregon 5 was decided by 9%
Pennsylvania 6 was decided by 2%
South Dakota 1 was decided by 7%
Texas 17 was decided by 3%
Washington 8 was decided by 4%

There were only 18 semi-close races in the entire country...

House Races with a less than 5% gap

Colorado 3 was decided by 3%,
Connecticutt 4 was decided by 4%
Georgia 12 was decided by 4%
Illinois 8 was decided by 4%
Indiania 9 was basically tied
New York 27 was decided by 2%
Pennsylvania 6 was decided by 2%
Texas 17 was decided by 3%
Washington 8 was decided by 4%

If you use less than 5% as the criteria, there were only 9 competitive House races in the whole country...








Logged
Bob Dole '96
mpirner
Rookie
**
Posts: 89


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #4 on: November 23, 2004, 12:02:37 PM »

Kansas-3 is usually a nail biter but Kobach ran a bad race here.  Was less than 5 in 00 and 02 and Bush won by 20 here.
Logged
jimrtex
Atlas Icon
*****
Posts: 11,817
Marshall Islands


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #5 on: November 24, 2004, 02:13:04 AM »

Cool :-)

Now if only the state legislatures would see sense and un-gerrymander the Congressional Districts...

The degree to which the Huse of Representatives is Gerrymandered is the truly astonishing political scandal that nobody reports (primarily because both parties are equally guilty)

There are none from Iowa on your list.  Or for example, take the Alabama 5th CD.   Cramer (D) won by 46%, yet it appears that Bush had about a 58-42 lead.

You either have to have term limits (which is what makes the presidential race "open"), or you have to redistrict incumbents out of office, as was done in Texas.
Logged
Gustaf
Moderators
Atlas Star
*****
Posts: 29,781


Political Matrix
E: 0.39, S: -0.70

Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #6 on: November 24, 2004, 05:25:16 AM »

Yep. Usually the VPs lose, that is after 2 terms the challenger usually wins, as happened in 2000, 1976 (arguably), 1968, 1960, 1952 and 1920.
Logged
Democratic Hawk
LucysBeau
Atlas Icon
*****
Posts: 14,703
United Kingdom


Political Matrix
E: -2.58, S: 2.43

Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #7 on: November 24, 2004, 08:46:48 AM »

2008 can't come soon enough for this political junkie!

Dave
Logged
Beefalow and the Consumer
Beef
Junior Chimp
*****
Posts: 9,123
United States


Political Matrix
E: -2.77, S: -8.78

Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #8 on: November 24, 2004, 12:51:39 PM »

Cool :-)

Now if only the state legislatures would see sense and un-gerrymander the Congressional Districts...

The degree to which the Huse of Representatives is Gerrymandered is the truly astonishing political scandal that nobody reports (primarily because both parties are equally guilty)

HEY!  Just because every GOP-held CD in Wisconsin got more Republican, and every Dem-held CD in Wisconsin got more Democratic, does NOT mean there's Gerrymandering going on OK?

:-)

Anyway, it's not "Gerrymanding."  It's called "Protecting your ass(ets)."
Logged
Beefalow and the Consumer
Beef
Junior Chimp
*****
Posts: 9,123
United States


Political Matrix
E: -2.77, S: -8.78

Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #9 on: November 24, 2004, 02:11:09 PM »

As the first race in a hald century without a "Status Quo" candidate it certainly opens up possibilities.

For example, at least in theory, both the Dem AND GOP candidates could both campaign as agents of change.

This is all assuming Condi doesn't get the nod for the GOP.

Heck, if Cheney's heart blows up, Condi might well be appointed VP.
Logged
The Vorlon
Vorlon
YaBB God
*****
Posts: 4,660


Political Matrix
E: 8.00, S: -4.21

Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #10 on: November 24, 2004, 02:26:57 PM »

Cool :-)

Now if only the state legislatures would see sense and un-gerrymander the Congressional Districts...

The degree to which the Huse of Representatives is Gerrymandered is the truly astonishing political scandal that nobody reports (primarily because both parties are equally guilty)

HEY!  Just because every GOP-held CD in Wisconsin got more Republican, and every Dem-held CD in Wisconsin got more Democratic, does NOT mean there's Gerrymandering going on OK?

:-)

Anyway, it's not "Gerrymanding."  It's called "Protecting your ass(ets)."

The US is fairly close to a 50/50 nation.

Yet out of 435 House seats, 87% were decided by more than a 60/40 margin.

Ok..

Logged
Beefalow and the Consumer
Beef
Junior Chimp
*****
Posts: 9,123
United States


Political Matrix
E: -2.77, S: -8.78

Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #11 on: November 24, 2004, 02:56:36 PM »

The US is fairly close to a 50/50 nation.

Yet out of 435 House seats, 87% were decided by more than a 60/40 margin.

Actually, that's just because both the urban areas and the countryside are split roughly 70/30.  The only 50/50 CDs are suburban ones.

Not saying we aren't Gerrymandered up the wazoo.  Just pointing out that the nation is highly ideologically heterogeneous.
Logged
Alcon
Atlas Superstar
*****
Posts: 30,866
United States


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #12 on: November 24, 2004, 02:58:07 PM »

That's exactly what I meant to say Beef, but somehow I managed to post just quoting Vorlon. The holidays must be getting to me... Wink
Logged
Pages: [1]  
« previous next »
Jump to:  


Login with username, password and session length

Terms of Service - DMCA Agent and Policy - Privacy Policy and Cookies

Powered by SMF 1.1.21 | SMF © 2015, Simple Machines

Page created in 0.222 seconds with 13 queries.