DC Al Fine
Atlas Icon
Posts: 14,080
|
|
« on: November 11, 2013, 04:39:12 PM » |
|
I thought I'd show how some elections would've turned out if a pure proportional system was used with no threshold. FTR I'm using d'Hondt method with no threshold in this calculatorFirst, here's this year's German election results without a threshold. Difference from actual results in parentheses. CDU: 218 (-37) SPD: 164 (-29)Linke: 54 (-10)Greens: 54 (-9)CSU: 47 (-9)FDP: 30 (+30)AfD: 30 (+30)Pirates: 14 +(14)NPD: 8 (+8)Free Voters: 6 (+6)Animal Protection: 2 (+2) ODP: 1 (+1)Republicans: 1 (+1)The Party: 1 (+1) Probably another grand coalition government, but at least the FDP and AfD voters get some seats as well as the supporters of many fringe parties
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
🦀🎂🦀🎂
CrabCake
Atlas Icon
Posts: 19,310
|
|
« Reply #22 on: December 08, 2014, 11:20:30 AM » |
|
BUMP
Australia 2013
ALP (34.7%): 54 (-1) Lib (33.3%): 51 (-7) LNP (9.3%): 14 (-8) Green (9.0%): 13 (+12) PUP (5.7%): 8 (+7) Nat (4.5%): 6 (-3) FF (1.5%): 2 (+2) KAP (1.1%): 1 (nc) CD (0.7%): 1 (+1) Count Lib (0.3%): 0 (-1)
In total the Coalition would have scored 71 seats, 5 short of a majority; while an ALP-Green coalition would have 67.
So probably a minority government, with PUP in the balance of power.
The 40 senate seats up are interesting, in that under the Australian system the major parties are inflated by straight PR, the Greens and PUP are stagnant, while Xenephon, AMEP, ASP and FF find themselves in the cold. Coalition (43.0%): 19 (+2) ALP (34.4%): 15 (+3) Green (9.9%): 4 (nc) PUP (5.6%): 2 (nc)
|
|
|
|
|
|