how is refusing to serve blacks remotely linked to the First Amendment?
Apparnetely it's your "free expression" to deny blacks service. I got into some argument with Philip over this. He thinks denying blacks service is more protected than dancing naked.
Uh, no. I said neither is protected by the First Amendment. However, denying blacks service is at least remotely connected to free association, whereas dancing naked is obviously not covered by anything.
No, dancing naked is clearly speech.
Actually, according to definition, it is.
Poll
