Also disingenuous that Ken completely leaves out the part about knowing the exact day, but includes the part about the year to further the narrative he's trying to push.
He's not pushing a narrative. The guy has gone after Trump plenty of times.
"He has also pushed a different narrative in the past" is not a refutation to.the idea that he's pushing a particular narrative now.
Convince me that it's his goal to hurt Biden specifically and as opposed to attempting to be an unbiased reporter and I might go with the idea he's pushing a narrative here and also pushed a different narrative in the past. Otherwise, I'm sticking with no, he's not trying to push a narrative here.
I just saw this guy on air discuss both the Beau Biden issue in the transcript (which is not rosy for Biden) and then explain how the transcript shows he doesn't have a memory problem. So you tell me why I should take all of these facts and conclude he's trying to push an anti Biden narrative. To me that makes no sense if he's criticized Trump in the past, including with respect to classified documents, and also defended Biden on his memory. Yes technically none of that is formally inconsistent with briefly pushing an anti-Biden on the issue of his memory. Who cares? It is for practical purposes.
