HRC - "Trump/Sanders capitalized on anger, I beat both, 3rd party ppl are crazy"

[Doimper]

She gave this country so much, wasted her entire adult life on it, and this is how she is thanked.  Hillary is too good for America.  She's the leader America needs, but not the one it deserves.  So she'll be attacked and disparaged, but she can take it.  She's a silent guardian, our watchful protector.

And you call the third-party voters crazy?

What kind of lunatic votes 3rd party? They are bunch of batshi* crazy losers & basement dwellers & will be living on food stamps all their lives. These people screwed Hillary of a win. It is only logical they get called crazy !

I'm very curious as to why someone who's possibly the most devoted Bernie cultist on this forum is demeaning people on food stamps

[Doimper]

I've said it before, but I'm glad that she lost. Trump is exactly the disaster that Democrats in 2018 need to win state governments in order to have a say in redistricting.

I've said it before, but I'm glad that he lost. Bush is exactly the disaster that Democrats in 2002 need to win back the House.

[Doimper]

Blah blah blah

I read the full quote when I read the article. I understand fully what was said then, as I do now. You don't. English isn't your native tongue and when combined with your partisan hackery, you're gonna read into it how you wanna read into it.

Nobody with a lick of coherency speaks in sentences like what you're describing. She said "I got more votes than Trump, and even more votes were cast for crazy third party people [candidates]". She didn't say "I got more votes than Trump plus there are crazy people in this country!". Logical sentence structure in the English language applies here. Careful and calculated politicians don't cram unrelated thoughts together in the same sentence. You even acknowledged this (unknowingly) with the following:

You must be logged in to read this quote.

Yes, the point was to outline how many votes were not cast for Trump; 66m for her and several million more for the nutty third partiers.

The context is very obvious to anybody not blinded by ideological zeal and determined to write Russian-influenced press releases on this forum constantly. It was obvious to me the moment I read it, but I recognized the ability for spin to be used on the way it was phrased.

English IS my first language, it is my mother's 1st language. Every book, every paper from school to university to masters, that I have had to read or every examination that I had to take part in, was in English. It is only language in which I can comfortably write. I find it highly insulting that you will resort to such slander & insults based on falsehoods. As someone, who was reading Charles Dickens/Mark Twain from the age of 7 and who has read entire plays of Shakespeare from the age of 12, I find it preposterous that someone like you will question my English language proficiency. I have a small library at my home, a large share of family have a Ph.d & I am a person who has been a part of various literary societies & has written/acted in plays in English. Your attack is deplorable & you should apologize.

This reads like a bizarre Atlas twist on that Navy Seals copypasta.