Packing the courts is better for the Dems, even if the Republicans pack back
       |           

Welcome, Guest. Please login or register.
Did you miss your activation email?
May 16, 2024, 09:50:38 PM
News: Election Simulator 2.0 Released. Senate/Gubernatorial maps, proportional electoral votes, and more - Read more

  Talk Elections
  General Politics
  U.S. General Discussion (Moderators: The Dowager Mod, Chancellor Tanterterg)
  Packing the courts is better for the Dems, even if the Republicans pack back
« previous next »
Pages: 1 2 3 [4]
Author Topic: Packing the courts is better for the Dems, even if the Republicans pack back  (Read 2836 times)
Absentee Voting Ghost of Ruin
Runeghost
Atlas Icon
*****
Posts: 19,578


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #75 on: October 24, 2020, 07:19:45 AM »




This is partisan court packing in action. Anyone repeating the Republicans hand-wringing about possible future Democratic court-packing is carrying water for the GOP.
Logged
R.P. McM
Jr. Member
***
Posts: 1,378
Palestinian Territory, Occupied


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #76 on: October 28, 2020, 03:40:20 AM »

The last thing the plutocrats want is a SC accountable to public opinion.

I'm not sure if anyone should really want that.

I think a 7-6 Democratic majority would respect minority rights to a far greater extent than a 6-3 Republican majority. It's certainly not out of the question that the latter would attempt to reimpose the social mores of white evangelicals, to disastrous consequences for non-Christians, non-heterosexuals, and nonwhites.
Logged
Filuwaúrdjan
Realpolitik
Atlas Institution
*****
Posts: 67,802
United Kingdom


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #77 on: October 28, 2020, 02:58:42 PM »

The last thing the plutocrats want is a SC accountable to public opinion.

I'm not sure if anyone should really want that.

I think a 7-6 Democratic majority would respect minority rights to a far greater extent than a 6-3 Republican majority. It's certainly not out of the question that the latter would attempt to reimpose the social mores of white evangelicals, to disastrous consequences for non-Christians, non-heterosexuals, and nonwhites.

That might be so - though rulings along 'partisan' lines are a lot less common than widely assumed - but has little to do with 'a SC accountable to public opinion'. I repeat: I do not think that anyone should really want that.
Logged
Pages: 1 2 3 [4]  
« previous next »
Jump to:  


Login with username, password and session length

Terms of Service - DMCA Agent and Policy - Privacy Policy and Cookies

Powered by SMF 1.1.21 | SMF © 2015, Simple Machines

Page created in 0.025 seconds with 9 queries.