SENATE BILL: Executive Compensation Act of 2014 (Redraft Vetoed) (user search)
       |           

Welcome, Guest. Please login or register.
May 19, 2024, 12:18:51 AM
News: Election Simulator 2.0 Released. Senate/Gubernatorial maps, proportional electoral votes, and more - Read more

  Talk Elections
  Atlas Fantasy Elections
  Atlas Fantasy Government (Moderators: Southern Senator North Carolina Yankee, Lumine)
  SENATE BILL: Executive Compensation Act of 2014 (Redraft Vetoed) (search mode)
Pages: [1]
Author Topic: SENATE BILL: Executive Compensation Act of 2014 (Redraft Vetoed)  (Read 2438 times)
🐒Gods of Prosperity🔱🐲💸
shua
Atlas Star
*****
Posts: 25,721
Nepal


Political Matrix
E: 1.29, S: -0.70

WWW
« on: April 23, 2014, 06:23:15 PM »

What's wrong with stock-based compensation?
Logged
🐒Gods of Prosperity🔱🐲💸
shua
Atlas Star
*****
Posts: 25,721
Nepal


Political Matrix
E: 1.29, S: -0.70

WWW
« Reply #1 on: April 24, 2014, 12:08:34 PM »

What's wrong with stock-based compensation?

Executives, or whoever receives the compensation, are incentivized to manage stock price to maximize their returns. By definition, this means that they need to manage expectations and then attempt to exceed them, rather than actually perform well.

If they are maximizing returns, how is that not performing well?
Logged
🐒Gods of Prosperity🔱🐲💸
shua
Atlas Star
*****
Posts: 25,721
Nepal


Political Matrix
E: 1.29, S: -0.70

WWW
« Reply #2 on: May 04, 2014, 08:31:03 PM »
« Edited: May 04, 2014, 08:38:20 PM by shua »

July 1, 2014 is the beginning of the next fiscal year in Atlasia.   (At least I think it is.  I know it is in the Mideast.)
Logged
🐒Gods of Prosperity🔱🐲💸
shua
Atlas Star
*****
Posts: 25,721
Nepal


Political Matrix
E: 1.29, S: -0.70

WWW
« Reply #3 on: May 08, 2014, 01:24:18 AM »

Edited the amendment back to July 1 dates.

As for Tyrion's comment, FASB 142 is practically irrelevant for companies that aren't publicly traded.

True.


The changes are all friendly except cutting out the first sentence of the current clause 4, which I find hostile until we agree on a framework to replace the FASB standards for publicly traded companies.

Wouldn't IFRS be that framework according to DC's amendment?
Logged
🐒Gods of Prosperity🔱🐲💸
shua
Atlas Star
*****
Posts: 25,721
Nepal


Political Matrix
E: 1.29, S: -0.70

WWW
« Reply #4 on: May 11, 2014, 06:54:18 PM »

AYE on the amendment.
Logged
🐒Gods of Prosperity🔱🐲💸
shua
Atlas Star
*****
Posts: 25,721
Nepal


Political Matrix
E: 1.29, S: -0.70

WWW
« Reply #5 on: May 18, 2014, 08:46:02 PM »

Nay
Logged
🐒Gods of Prosperity🔱🐲💸
shua
Atlas Star
*****
Posts: 25,721
Nepal


Political Matrix
E: 1.29, S: -0.70

WWW
« Reply #6 on: May 28, 2014, 01:12:00 AM »

nay
Logged
Pages: [1]  
Jump to:  


Login with username, password and session length

Terms of Service - DMCA Agent and Policy - Privacy Policy and Cookies

Powered by SMF 1.1.21 | SMF © 2015, Simple Machines

Page created in 0.02 seconds with 10 queries.