Future approval

[dunn]

Clinton will be adore by democrats and ind, hated by reps.
Bush, well if he doesn't get elected they will just treat him as a one term president , if he wins it will come down to GWOT and economics. but the dems will never like hime

[dunn]

there has been one attack that has killed a few thousand people.

YUes, it was tragic, BUT it in no way compares to world war two.

Nowhere NEAR.

we are in 1938, and if you do not act It will be WW3

[dunn]

there has been one attack that has killed a few thousand people.

YUes, it was tragic, BUT it in no way compares to world war two.

Nowhere NEAR.

we are in 1938, and if you do not act It will be WW3

Against who? A terrorist network?

yes, and Islamic fondemendalists and the regims that let them flurish

[dunn]

there has been one attack that has killed a few thousand people.

YUes, it was tragic, BUT it in no way compares to world war two.

Nowhere NEAR.

we are in 1938, and if you do not act It will be WW3

Against who? A terrorist network?

yes, and Islamic fondemendalists and the regims that let them flurish

I don't think they have that much of an interest in terrorism, is more of an insurance policy, like with the Saudis. And they won't harbour terrorist organizations anymore, like the talibans did, the issue of letting flourish is kind of vague...would it include Spain?

what kind of insurence?
they are harbouring terror
it's not includinf the naive, only the evil

[dunn]

there has been one attack that has killed a few thousand people.

YUes, it was tragic, BUT it in no way compares to world war two.

Nowhere NEAR.

we are in 1938, and if you do not act It will be WW3

Against who? A terrorist network?

yes, and Islamic fondemendalists and the regims that let them flurish

I don't think they have that much of an interest in terrorism, is more of an insurance policy, like with the Saudis. And they won't harbour terrorist organizations anymore, like the talibans did, the issue of letting flourish is kind of vague...would it include Spain?

what kind of insurence?
they are harbouring terror
it's not includinf the naive, only the evil

The Saudis are so immensely impopular that their only chance of remainign in power is keeping the fundamentalists happy. The same goes for a lot of other Arab countries. There are few who are actually theocratic. The Afghans were an example, Iran might be another one.

And I think a World War with the Muslim world doesn't look the best possible way to go about things.

Saudia is worse then Iran. they chop the hands of thieves etc.

[dunn]

there has been one attack that has killed a few thousand people.

YUes, it was tragic, BUT it in no way compares to world war two.

Nowhere NEAR.

we are in 1938, and if you do not act It will be WW3

Against who? A terrorist network?

yes, and Islamic fondemendalists and the regims that let them flurish

I don't think they have that much of an interest in terrorism, is more of an insurance policy, like with the Saudis. And they won't harbour terrorist organizations anymore, like the talibans did, the issue of letting flourish is kind of vague...would it include Spain?

what kind of insurence?
they are harbouring terror
it's not includinf the naive, only the evil

The Saudis are so immensely impopular that their only chance of remainign in power is keeping the fundamentalists happy. The same goes for a lot of other Arab countries. There are few who are actually theocratic. The Afghans were an example, Iran might be another one.

And I think a World War with the Muslim world doesn't look the best possible way to go about things.

Saudia is worse then Iran. they chop the hands of thieves etc.

Lol, yes, Saudi-Arabia is worse than Iran, but they're an ally whereas Iran as a member of teh Axis of Evil remember?

most 9/11 terorist were saudies