MI-10 Thread: Dems vs James
       |           

Welcome, Guest. Please login or register.
Did you miss your activation email?
June 26, 2024, 02:29:53 AM
News: Election Simulator 2.0 Released. Senate/Gubernatorial maps, proportional electoral votes, and more - Read more

  Talk Elections
  Other Elections - Analysis and Discussion
  Congressional Elections (Moderators: Brittain33, GeorgiaModerate, Gass3268, Virginiá, Gracile)
  MI-10 Thread: Dems vs James
« previous next »
Pages: [1]
Poll
Question: Will James win reelection?
#1
Yes
 
#2
No
 
Show Pie Chart
Partisan results

Total Voters: 18

Author Topic: MI-10 Thread: Dems vs James  (Read 518 times)
wnwnwn
Sr. Member
****
Posts: 2,336
Peru


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« on: May 27, 2024, 11:59:41 PM »
« edited: May 28, 2024, 02:00:45 PM by wnwnwn »

There are various primary dem candidates, but I think that Marlinga is favored to again compete with James (R).
The district is based on Macomb County, altorught excluding some northern exburbs. It also includes the sightly D leaning Rochester Hills. The district's area was won by Trump on a 1% margin in 2020.

I think that dems in general should try to win back or at least reduce R gains in Macomb. Maybe the UAW and Slokin can help here a little.

Discuss.
Logged
Chancellor Tanterterg
Mr. X
Moderators
Atlas Star
*****
Posts: 26,843
United States


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #1 on: May 28, 2024, 02:27:15 PM »

I think Marlinga makes it Tilt R (much closer to Tilt D than Lean R) and could absolutely unseat James if Democrats seriously compete here this time.
Logged
Spectator
YaBB God
*****
Posts: 3,628
United States


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #2 on: May 28, 2024, 04:53:44 PM »

I don't think James will have much an issue this year with Trump likely to win the district again. 2022 was close because Democrats dominated upballot.

I think James is one of the first Republicans to lose in 2026 though if Trump is in the White House.
Logged
Progressive Pessimist
Atlas Superstar
*****
Posts: 34,672
United States


Political Matrix
E: -6.71, S: -7.65

Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #3 on: May 28, 2024, 04:53:52 PM »

James has incumbency and presidential turnout this time, making him favored.

Andy Levin really should have ran here in 2022. He probably would have won.
Logged
ProgressiveModerate
Atlas Icon
*****
Posts: 14,181


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #4 on: May 28, 2024, 05:04:06 PM »

I don't think James will have much an issue this year with Trump likely to win the district again. 2022 was close because Democrats dominated upballot.

I think James is one of the first Republicans to lose in 2026 though if Trump is in the White House.

Part of what I don't understand is why Dems didn't spend more against James here in 2022? As soon as it became clear Whitmer was pretty heavily favored in the Governor's race, it was pretty clear that she would carry this district at the top of the ticket. Additionally, James lost this district in his 2020 Senate bid despite outrunning Trump statewide. Bailing on this race in 2022 was a mistake for Dems imo.
Logged
Born to Slay. Forced to Work.
leecannon
Junior Chimp
*****
Posts: 7,235
United States


Political Matrix
E: -6.45, S: -6.78

Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #5 on: May 28, 2024, 10:13:56 PM »

James has incumbency and presidential turnout this time, making him favored.

Andy Levin really should have ran here in 2022. He probably would have won.

AIPAC went hard against Levin in 2022 (over 600,000). It probably would neutralize his incumbency.
Logged
Spectator
YaBB God
*****
Posts: 3,628
United States


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #6 on: May 29, 2024, 11:58:09 AM »

I don't think James will have much an issue this year with Trump likely to win the district again. 2022 was close because Democrats dominated upballot.

I think James is one of the first Republicans to lose in 2026 though if Trump is in the White House.

Part of what I don't understand is why Dems didn't spend more against James here in 2022? As soon as it became clear Whitmer was pretty heavily favored in the Governor's race, it was pretty clear that she would carry this district at the top of the ticket. Additionally, James lost this district in his 2020 Senate bid despite outrunning Trump statewide. Bailing on this race in 2022 was a mistake for Dems imo.

Maybe my memory is incorrect, but wasn’t there a polling mirage where Dixon was perceived to be closing the gap? Obviously those polls ended up total bullsh**t and Whitmer won by even more than she did in 2018. Had Dems known it was going to be a better year than even 2018, I imagine they would’ve invested.
Logged
cg41386
Jr. Member
***
Posts: 1,010
United States


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #7 on: May 29, 2024, 01:18:15 PM »

I don't think James will have much an issue this year with Trump likely to win the district again. 2022 was close because Democrats dominated upballot.

I think James is one of the first Republicans to lose in 2026 though if Trump is in the White House.

Part of what I don't understand is why Dems didn't spend more against James here in 2022? As soon as it became clear Whitmer was pretty heavily favored in the Governor's race, it was pretty clear that she would carry this district at the top of the ticket. Additionally, James lost this district in his 2020 Senate bid despite outrunning Trump statewide. Bailing on this race in 2022 was a mistake for Dems imo.

Maybe my memory is incorrect, but wasn’t there a polling mirage where Dixon was perceived to be closing the gap? Obviously those polls ended up total bullsh**t and Whitmer won by even more than she did in 2018. Had Dems known it was going to be a better year than even 2018, I imagine they would’ve invested.

I think there were some close-ish polls at some point.
Logged
Pages: [1]  
« previous next »
Jump to:  


Login with username, password and session length

Terms of Service - DMCA Agent and Policy - Privacy Policy and Cookies

Powered by SMF 1.1.21 | SMF © 2015, Simple Machines

Page created in 0.232 seconds with 14 queries.