TX (UT Texas/YouGov): Cruz +11
       |           

Welcome, Guest. Please login or register.
Did you miss your activation email?
June 27, 2024, 07:24:34 AM
News: Election Simulator 2.0 Released. Senate/Gubernatorial maps, proportional electoral votes, and more - Read more

  Talk Elections
  Other Elections - Analysis and Discussion
  Congressional Elections
  2024 Senate & House Election Polls (Moderators: Brittain33, GeorgiaModerate, Gass3268, Virginiá, Gracile)
  TX (UT Texas/YouGov): Cruz +11
« previous next »
Pages: [1]
Author Topic: TX (UT Texas/YouGov): Cruz +11  (Read 289 times)
Sir Mohamed
MohamedChalid
Atlas Star
*****
Posts: 23,257
United States



Show only this user's posts in this thread
« on: June 20, 2024, 09:04:23 AM »
« edited: June 20, 2024, 09:15:13 AM by Sir Mohamed »

Cruz - 45%
Allred - 34%

Meanwhile, Biden is only down by 7, 46-39%.

https://texaspolitics.utexas.edu/blog/most-gop-voters-say-former-president-didn%E2%80%99t-get-fair-trial-new-york-trump-maintains-46-39-lead
Logged
Terry the Fat Shark
Junior Chimp
*****
Posts: 6,516
United States


P P
Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #1 on: June 20, 2024, 09:09:26 AM »

(poll conducted by YouGov)
Logged
SnowLabrador
Atlas Icon
*****
Posts: 10,424
United States


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #2 on: June 20, 2024, 09:11:07 AM »

Yeah, this isn't flipping. The burden is now on Democrats to hold both Ohio and Montana, as well as all of their swing-state seats.
Logged
Sir Mohamed
MohamedChalid
Atlas Star
*****
Posts: 23,257
United States



Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #3 on: June 20, 2024, 09:16:59 AM »

Yeah, this isn't flipping. The burden is now on Democrats to hold both Ohio and Montana, as well as all of their swing-state seats.

It was always a longshot. MT and OH are the most worrisome, obviously. Meanwhile, I believe Dems have a good shot at holding AZ while Dems are favored in PA, WI and MI as well. I don't even consider PA competitive. Neither is Kaine in danger.
Logged
They not like us
20RP12
Atlas Superstar
*****
Posts: 38,605
United States


Political Matrix
E: -5.29, S: -7.13

Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #4 on: June 20, 2024, 09:31:08 AM »

Likely R, as expected. Democrats shouldn't waste a ton of resources on the Senate race, but investing in some of the closer house districts to at least bring the margins down to potentially flip Cornyn's seat in 2026 would be wise, especially if it's a Trump midterm. I don't think Texas will flip in a Presidential election year for at least another cycle or two.
Logged
Amenhotep Bakari-Sellers
olawakandi
Atlas Institution
*****
Posts: 90,776
Jamaica
Political Matrix
E: -6.84, S: -0.17

P P P

Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #5 on: June 20, 2024, 09:32:16 AM »

Yeah, this isn't flipping. The burden is now on Democrats to hold both Ohio and Montana, as well as all of their swing-state seats.

It was always a longshot. MT and OH are the most worrisome, obviously. Meanwhile, I believe Dems have a good shot at holding AZ while Dems are favored in PA, WI and MI as well. I don't even consider PA competitive. Neither is Kaine in danger.

Ds are putting their baskets in FL
Logged
Proud Independent
Rookie
**
Posts: 58
Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #6 on: June 20, 2024, 09:33:44 AM »
« Edited: June 20, 2024, 09:41:08 AM by Proud Independent »

Yeah, this isn't flipping. The burden is now on Democrats to hold both Ohio and Montana, as well as all of their swing-state seats.

I'm really not shocked. Besides being African American and not being Ted Cruz, what does Allred offer? He seems like a less charismatic Beto. It also doesn't help his case that he's running with Biden on the ticket who has pretty much been a disaster on immigration/ the border. And is just only doing something, clearly because we're rapidly approaching the election so he's just trying to soften the blow regarding his approval rating of handling the aforementioned issues.
Logged
Spectator
YaBB God
*****
Posts: 3,633
United States


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #7 on: June 20, 2024, 09:41:13 AM »

Likely R, as expected. Democrats shouldn't waste a ton of resources on the Senate race, but investing in some of the closer house districts to at least bring the margins down to potentially flip Cornyn's seat in 2026 would be wise, especially if it's a Trump midterm. I don't think Texas will flip in a Presidential election year for at least another cycle or two.

2028 after a second Trump term would be very much a real possibility, and I’d frankly be almost surprised if it didn’t (provided Democrats actually competed).
Logged
Progressive Pessimist
Atlas Superstar
*****
Posts: 34,699
United States


Political Matrix
E: -6.71, S: -7.65

Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #8 on: June 20, 2024, 05:44:45 PM »

Yeah, this isn't flipping. The burden is now on Democrats to hold both Ohio and Montana, as well as all of their swing-state seats.

That was always the path of least resistance. I would prefer any resources being considered for Florida and Texas go to Montana and Ohio instead.
Logged
SnowLabrador
Atlas Icon
*****
Posts: 10,424
United States


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #9 on: June 20, 2024, 05:53:16 PM »

Yeah, this isn't flipping. The burden is now on Democrats to hold both Ohio and Montana, as well as all of their swing-state seats.

That was always the path of least resistance. I would prefer any resources being considered for Florida and Texas go to Montana and Ohio instead.

For a while I thought Texas would be easier for Democrats than Montana, but I think I underestimated the value of incumbency. I mean, it's the reason Senate Democrats are running 5-10 points ahead of Biden.
Logged
President Punxsutawney Phil
TimTurner
Atlas Politician
Atlas Legend
*****
Posts: 42,397
United States


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #10 on: June 20, 2024, 05:55:55 PM »

Yeah, this isn't flipping. The burden is now on Democrats to hold both Ohio and Montana, as well as all of their swing-state seats.

That was always the path of least resistance. I would prefer any resources being considered for Florida and Texas go to Montana and Ohio instead.

For a while I thought Texas would be easier for Democrats than Montana, but I think I underestimated the value of incumbency. I mean, it's the reason Senate Democrats are running 5-10 points ahead of Biden.
Incumbency is quite powerful, yes.
Logged
Amenhotep Bakari-Sellers
olawakandi
Atlas Institution
*****
Posts: 90,776
Jamaica
Political Matrix
E: -6.84, S: -0.17

P P P

Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #11 on: June 20, 2024, 10:54:13 PM »

Yeah, this isn't flipping. The burden is now on Democrats to hold both Ohio and Montana, as well as all of their swing-state seats.

That was always the path of least resistance. I would prefer any resources being considered for Florida and Texas go to Montana and Ohio instead.

We are contesting FL S still
Logged
Unelectable Bystander
Jr. Member
***
Posts: 1,116
Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #12 on: June 21, 2024, 07:33:44 AM »

Not surprising when you look at the job approval numbers for Cruz. The only constituency he’s unpopular with is atlas Dems.
Logged
Pages: [1]  
« previous next »
Jump to:  


Login with username, password and session length

Terms of Service - DMCA Agent and Policy - Privacy Policy and Cookies

Powered by SMF 1.1.21 | SMF © 2015, Simple Machines

Page created in 0.034 seconds with 13 queries.